I have heard Catherine say the distance was closer to a meter. Why are you so fixated on the distance ignoring the other variables, which taken together are conclusive. These data are accepted as evidence in courts, yet we allow the Left and the MSM to dismiss the data. Try Googling 2000 mules and you will get a list of articles debunking it. Same with Bing. Big Tech is using algorithms to bias the search.
“Of course, there are ways to eliminate passers-by and county workers, of course, there are ways to confirm that the people in the videos are (or are not) mules. Larry Campbell, dropping off 6 ballots for his big family, wouldn’t be in our study. Going once to a dropbox wasn’t in our study. Our mules averaged 38 dropbox visits and 8 NGO visits. Any other combination (ex. going to NGOs and USPS boxes, for example, wouldn’t have been in our study. Or going to 100 dropboxes, but no NGOs. They weren’t in our study.) That’s how we know this is the tip of the iceberg.”
The numbers are stunning when the minimum criteria of 10 drop boxes, with 5 visits and a handful of ballots delivered per visit, are considered. By that calculus, it is a potential 380,000 illegal votes. When those criteria are lowered to fewer dropboxes and visits, another 810,000 illegal votes. In Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania, the mules allegedly cast more than enough illegal votes to overcome the margin of defeat for Trump.
Also in 2000 Mules, private citizens camped out in their cars and recorded mules...!!!!
Thanks for responding, but I guess I have to repeat myself.
The question is not "Is Geospatial Data with Cellphones Precise?"
The question is "How precise was the specific geospatial data purchased by True The Vote."
Contrary to what some Freepers seem to believe, I did not come up with the the 100 foot figure myself. I first saw it in the Georgia Bureau of Investigation letter, and I was surprised to see Dinesh D'Souza effectively confirm it in his interview with Philip Bump.
Where did the 100 foot number originate? Perhaps from phone companies or other geospatial data vendors that sold their data to TTV. The accuracy/precision numbers should have been specified in the sale documents, e.g. "We are selling 1.2 terabytes of geospatial data to True the Vote that we guarantee to be accurate to within a radius of 100 feet." If those sales documents say "accurate to with one meter" then TTV should long ago have released them to the public, and the information should have been highlighted in 2000 Mules. Instead the number was kept hidden, which was one of the red flags for me that the film was not what it pretended to be -- and what I wanted it to be.
The number becomes critically important when considering the criminal prosecution of mules based on the geospatial data. No prosecutor will bring a case based on 100 foot data. "Let me get this straight. You are accusing my client of voter fraud because he drove within 100 feet of a few ballot boxes?"
So, why would the TTV accuracy only be 100 feet, when it can be much better? Perhaps the data vendors were using old equipment, perhaps there were environmental factors affecting reception, there could me many reasons. I'm sure the data vendors would have liked to be able to say that they guaranteed the data to be more accurate, but for some reason, that did not happen. D'Souza has had a long time to clear this up, and he just keeps repeating "Geospatial data can be very accurate!" He never says, "The companies that sold us our data guaranteed that it would be highly accurate, and I'll provide the documentation." Why hasn't he done that?
My other main point in this thread is that if the mule hypothesis in 2000 Mules is correct, by now there should have been many confirmations of that, with plenty of mules and stash houses identified. The bigger the conspiracy, the greater the chances of leaks, and this conspiracy supposedly involved many thousands of people. It was gigantic. Yet the expected confirmation has not appeared. Why not?
Trump does not need D'Souza and TTV on his team, and Freepers should not trust them.