“If elections are conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the government." Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

wicourts.gov ^ | July 8, 2022 | SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN

[ransomnote]

 

In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 07/28/22 Vol.415, Q Day 1835, grey_whiskers wrote:

From a poster, roastytoasty , on tonight’s open thread on Instapundit:

THIS is THE top story of the day:

Wisconsin Supreme Court says:
“If elections are conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the government. Such elections are unlawful, and their results are illegitimate.” — Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley, writing for the Wisconsin Supreme Court majority in Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

The article is at Issues and Insights. The screen containing the report is frozen. The ConservativeTreehouse website is offline. For obvious reasons, powers that be are suppressing this information

https://issuesinsights.com/2022/08/01/a-declaration-of-dissolution-wisconsin-supreme-court-fires-the-starting-gun/

Here is a 141-page pdf of the decision:
https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542617

Please. Do what you can with these links.

ransomnote: Ping to conversion Wisconsin decision re 2020 election to text in case PDF becomes ‘hard to find’. HTML versions have too many blank lines inserted - this text only version is ugly but may be more legible. May be....

Original PDF: https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542617

TEXT VERSION ON FR: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4044348/posts?page=2129#2129

[No.6]

I agree but that was July 8, 2022 and here we still are, results stand, Zuck is now paying for mobile voting trucks despite rulings.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/fraud-racine-wisconsin-rolls-mobile-home-voting-station-wheels-paid-exclusively-zuckerbucks/

The old left rule was “the courts haven’t ruled so we keep going.” The new left rule is “since the courts deem us 100% wrong, ignore them and keep going.” (Abortion, 2A, voting just 3 recent examples.)

[Telepathic Intruder]

Here in America, if you question the election process or show doubts that they are conducted freely or fairly, you disappear. You don’t get a public trial, and you don’t get to speak in your own defense.

[Revel]

Where are the tire slashing environmental wackos when you need them?

[Southside_Chicago_Republican]

Bookmark

[FreeReign]

“If elections are conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the government." Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

The people not conferring their consent on the government. Doesn't sound like an republican form of government.

So much for Article IV, Section 4.

[Boomer]

Well that settles it. Biden the Cheater is illegitimate because there’s no way he won within the law. We have known this for some time. In Arizona alone it has been proven beyond a doubt Trump won.

It’s reasonable to assume every other state that changed the numbers around 3:00 AM also went for Trump making him the Lawful President right now.

[lakecumberlandvet]

We know the truth but we have to live with the lie.

[Jacquerie]

To Guarantee a Republican Form of Government.

[mewzilla]

Even if they are conducted inside the kaw. Case in point...

Wisconsin places inactive voters back on rolls, key lawmaker calls it 'mind-boggling'