To: StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; 31R1O; ...
2 posted on
08/01/2022 12:36:30 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: SunkenCiv
You put the lime in the boat and sink it all up................
3 posted on
08/01/2022 12:46:59 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: SunkenCiv
Why is the Institute of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archeology studying a 16th century shipwreck from the Hanseatic period? They put the wrong department on the job.
“Protohistoric” refers to the time period before the earliest recorded history.
4 posted on
08/01/2022 12:48:12 PM PDT by
ProtectOurFreedom
(“May your neighbors respect you, trouble neglect you, angels protect you and heaven accept you”)
To: SunkenCiv
The obvious ploy is obvious.
Baen Books and Ring of Fire Press obviously conspired to have that “wreck” placed and “found” as a means of increasing interest in the 1632 series of books and Gazette.
For realzies.
You just read it here on the internet. The internet never lies. Therefore, upso defacto, it must be true.
14 posted on
08/01/2022 2:10:18 PM PDT by
Grimmy
(equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
