“I refute it thus!”
- Samuel Johnson.
Einstein's implicit, internal contradiction of the natural world (entanglement via Spukhafte Verwirkung (SV)) has never been proved (it's not even a theory, but rather, a false assertion). (That's where the ridicule should be directed.)
The Deep State has perpetuated such apparent contradiction just so they could put further years of developmental distance between classified, NDA-covered physics research (e.g., torsion physics, frame-drop physics, verified instantaneous actions at a distance with rates of induction ("speed") 16x or more than that of light and other things considered at Area 51/S4) and that (as described in this article) which is taught in universities.
SV is as much scientific voodoo as its German name implies, launching and venturing into areas of ignorance as grand as anything Fauci, WHO, FDA, NIH, NIAID, the Wuhan and Ukrainian labs ever bamboozled their bosses with. Einstein was an unrelenting bigot and plagiarist who never deserved the Nobel Prize (even well before that same was shown to be discredited).
Quantum/particle physics has been perpetuated out on its limb just to keep academic physicists in high-paying jobs, while doing little to expand the public's actual knowledge of the universe.
Mathematics correlates to the universe in many ways, e.g., Maxwell Field Equations, but it doesn't explain the foundational basis of anything any more than an elusive CERN LHC Higgs Boson would purport to explain God.
More precisely, reality doesn’t exist unless somebody observes it. This is the core of the Bishop Berkeley’s demonstration of the existence of God.
“There is no spoon...”
You're welcome.
A giant half truth.
Certain quirky things that appear present at the quantum level, are not things/states that any empirical evidence has shown to exist many levels up where you get to solid matter as we know it.
We do not empirically know any conscience existence at the quatum - elemental physics - level.
To infer “time” - a human measure of the transitions of physical existence, to occurances of actions at the quantum level is a scientific error, an anthropomorphization of the quantum fields of physics.
but once something is measured then the primacy of existence takes effect and objective reality is independent of and not created by emotionalism or wishful thinking (such as by lefturd loons subjectivism)
I don’t accept that. Humans measure things. I don’t recall hearing that the stars measure things. And what was there before the stars? Material that gave rise to the stars.
Reality is that which exists. To say that reality doesn’t exist is to contradict the nature of reality.
All this started from the uncertainty principle of Heisenberg, who said that one cannot assign exact simultaneous values to the position and momentum of a physical system. Then came the thought experiment of Schrödinger in which some say a “cat” is both alive and dead.
This has gone too far.
Reality is that which exists, regardless of whether it is perceived by a sentient being or not.
Remember the sophomoric question, if the tree falls in the forest, and no one was there to hear it, did it make any noise?
Apparently, according to these guys, if there was no one there, there was no tree, and there was no forest.
It’s like the Ancient Greek who delighted in proving, mathematically, that you cannot outrun a turtle.
sounds like a language game. as in depends on what the meaning of is is.
or a pun
—Or who should I say has sent me—Moses.
—Tell them I am who I am has sent you—God.
Exodus 3:13-14