Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Texas Fossil

Q&A with the two doctors who did the study. Yes, more testing needed. One thing a doctor said was that he’s surprised the testing they did hadn’t already been done.
https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/article/qa-covid-19-vaccine-study-gains-attention


5 posted on 07/12/2022 7:46:11 AM PDT by Pollard (If there's a question mark in the headline, the answer should always be No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pollard

‘’We understood that the study would attract attention, but we think it is self-evident that this type of research should be pursued. We have a new vaccine, and it needs to be tested in cell and animal models and also in humans, in various ways.

The result might be surprising, but it is also a bit surprising that such studies do not seem to have been carried out …..’’

————

Yeah, most of us old school folks take the 5-7 years{minimum) to bring a product like this to market seriously and since our concerns were brushed off and even ridiculed, we opted out…


11 posted on 07/12/2022 7:57:17 AM PDT by ALX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/article/qa-covid-19-vaccine-study-gains-attention

Two of the authors, Associate Professor Yang de Marinis (YDM) and Professor Magnus Rasmussen (MR), share their views.

YDM: This study does not investigate whether the Pfizer vaccine alters our genome. Our publication is the first in vitro study on the conversion of mRNA vaccine into DNA, inside cells of human origin. We show that the vaccine enters liver cells as early as 6 hours after the vaccine has been administered. We saw that there was DNA converted from the vaccine’s mRNA in the host cells we studied.

MR: These findings were observed in petri dishes under experimental conditions, but we do not yet know if the converted DNA is integrated into the cells’ DNA in the genome - and if so, if it has any consequences.

MR: We understood that the study would attract attention, but we think it is self-evident that this type of research should be pursued. We have a new vaccine, and it needs to be tested in cell and animal models and also in humans, in various ways. The result might be surprising, but it is also a bit surprising that such studies do not seem to have been carried out before.


12 posted on 07/12/2022 7:59:03 AM PDT by Pollard (If there's a question mark in the headline, the answer should always be No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

Field testing. This was the largest beta test ever, with millions of lab rats, er, uninformed human victims, so there is a LOT of statistical data piled up.

Just nobody revealing the results, because of possible bad publicity. Still, anecdotal information keeps intruding.

The side effects are only now becoming evident, and still not compiled over the long term.


31 posted on 07/12/2022 8:32:02 AM PDT by alloysteel (There are folks running the government who shouldn't be allowed to play with matches - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

The people in charge had no desire to run this type of test.

They were “obligated” to support the jab.


98 posted on 07/12/2022 11:00:33 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson