Replies

Without much work I found articles evaluating laser fetoscopy as early as 2005.
The point though is not whether this procedure was available then, there were other treatments such as selective removal of amniotic fluid even earlier, but the mischaracterization by the author of the article that the existence of twin twin transfusion syndrome means that there can be no law against abortion at any stage in pregnancy since selective termination is needed to save one twin.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19788973/
Incidence of complications in twin-twin transfusion syndrome after ...Study design: One hundred fifty-two cases of TTTS were treated with selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation from 2005-2008.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2666485/
Between July 2006 and June 2008, 19 monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies complicated by severe TTTS (Quintero stages III and IV) underwent fetoscopic laser ...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19281575/
Selective fetoscopic laser ablation in 100 consecutive pregnancies with severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Feb ...

FTA:

“’We didn’t have any family with us in Cincinnati, I remember calling my mom,” Tiffany said. “I told the doctors beforehand, before we met, you know, after the three days of testing, and I said, ‘I don’t want to see pictures, I don’t want to see the stats… Just tell me what, what procedure we can do.’”

A decision was made to perform a radio frequency abortion on one of the twins. The procedure is done in cases of TTTS in order to save the life of one of the babies, while terminating the life of the other by cutting off the supply to the baby’s umbilical cord.

After the procedure, Tiffany’s water broke, and steps were taken to stop her from going into labor. Overall, the couple spent ten days in Ohio before they made the drive home.

“While we were driving back home, I said to my husband at the time, I said, I think what we just had done will be banned,” Tiffany said.’”

So, it sounds as if a few doctors perhaps carefully considered what could be done in her situation and perhaps they decided nothing could be done to save both babies.

Or maybe no one wanted to try.

It’s not clear.

But I imagine there are a few scenarios where a twin just can’t be save and allowing the pregnancy to continue is risking not just the other twin but the mother.

But, in this case, it sounds as if this woman did a 180 and is now for abortion rather than just for making sure abortion bans have carefully carved out exceptions not just for life of the mother but life of the other fetus in the womb.

I would not think it would be too hard to write up abortion bans to include such things as three doctors needing to sign off on there being no alternative but to take the life of a fetus and subjecting the sign off to after action review by a panel of doctors.