If Congress passed a law codifying the principles of Roe, it would be challenged in court. Whether it would be ruled unconstitutional is an open question. A federal law saying that the people are be free to exercise their right to secure abortions as ‘health care’ at will and not be restrained by any state, would start with four votes in approval. If arguments swayed one more, like Roberts eg, then Roe would be the legislated law.
I don’t see such a law being passed through the Senate, but I don’t think it is out of the question given the right electoral outcome.
Yet, they forced us to take shots we didn’t want and denied potentially lifesaving Covid care by prohibiting (and this has never been done before) Hydroxychloriquone abd Ivermectin from being prescribed even to people who already had prescriptions for illnesses like Lupus (many take Hydroxychloiquine).
I don’t see such a law being passed through the Senate, but I don’t think it is out of the question given the right electoral outcome.
First I am not sure the Democrat want to pass such a law. The abortion issue is one they use as a fund raiser so for them it is best left in doubt.
Second problem for the Democrats they are running out of time. They will soon be taking a break so those running for re-election can return home to campaign.
Last is that the American people are tired of the argument, there are more important issues they want Congress to address (like getting rid of Biden)
“If Congress passed a law codifying the principles of Roe, it would be challenged in court.”
BINGO!!