Posted on 07/08/2022 6:51:20 AM PDT by Red Badger
Thanks Red Badger. Buh buh buh buh Bennu meets some jets. Or somethin'.
Mostly planets transiting their stars are deduced through periodic slight dimming or the wobble of the star that is deduced as a planet’s gravitational pull in orbit.
I think the resolution from something 100K miles away and 100 light years would differ.
Excellent news when things are not as simple as originally thought...
Budget propagandists rejoice...
Sounds like the science wasn’t settled.
Actual working scientists already know that. Do you think we’re stupid?
Thanks anyway, though ...
That's the kind of "big if" they use on Ancient Aliens. The data do not support your premise.
Wobble (or Doppler) and transit methods are the most used methods, yes, in that order. Resolution beyond a single pixel using direct observation is of course not possible without an objective lens the size of the whole solar system or something. But even a single pixel can reveal a lot, such as chemical composition using spectrography. We’ll see what the James Webb can do over the next few years.
“Do you think we’re stupid?”
What does Hockey Stick Mann say?
Do you know any actual working scientists? Does your education in the natural sciences extend past high school?
Your immediate resort to a media-political celebrity suggests a negative answer to both questions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.