Skip to comments.
LHCb discovers three new exotic particles (Large Hadron Collider)
CERN ^
| July 5, 2022
Posted on 07/05/2022 9:38:11 AM PDT by rdl6989
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: steve86
“...the Planck constant is a hard limit.”
Unless...
21
posted on
07/05/2022 12:14:22 PM PDT
by
HKMk23
(https://youtu.be/LTseTg48568)
To: SunkenCiv
22
posted on
07/05/2022 12:45:05 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(MAGA POWER - - President Trump's endorsement record is 144-10)
To: rdl6989
Only time and more studies of exotic hadrons will tell if these particles are one, the other or both. LOL...No doubt we will also need ever-bigger versions of colliders to keep finding ever-smaller elementary particles. This is beginning to look like a "science fair" funded by a pocket with a deep space. And I blame this guy for starting the whole thing.
23
posted on
07/05/2022 1:03:26 PM PDT
by
PerConPat
(A politician is an animal which can sit on a fence and yet keep both ears to the ground. - Mencken)
To: Rebelbase
They were 26 at the time of that photo. I think part of it is bad 1970s TV studio makeup. “Quark” wasn’t exactly a high-budget show for showcasing the studio’s best talent.
24
posted on
07/05/2022 1:09:16 PM PDT
by
Charles Martel
(Progressives are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
To: GOPJ; 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...
25
posted on
07/05/2022 1:12:36 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: rdl6989
26
posted on
07/05/2022 1:14:56 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
To: SunkenCiv
I don’t think God cares that much of us fumbling in the weeds.
27
posted on
07/05/2022 1:54:47 PM PDT
by
Track9
(You are far too inquisitive not to be seduced…)
To: rdl6989
Have any of these Colliders ever paid for themselves?
28
posted on
07/05/2022 4:26:54 PM PDT
by
aimhigh
(THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
To: rdl6989
"The first kind, observed in an analysis of “decays” of negatively charged B mesons, is a pentaquark made up of a charm quark and a charm antiquark and an up, a down and a strange quark. It is the first pentaquark found to contain a strange quark. The finding has a whopping statistical significance of 15 standard deviations, far beyond the 5 standard deviations that are required to claim the observation of a particle in particle physics. It's difficult to tell whether this is a scientific journal or a Dr. Seuss story.
29
posted on
07/05/2022 6:31:30 PM PDT
by
norwaypinesavage
(Capitalism is what happens when you leave people alone.)
To: SuperLuminal
"Most of the exotic hadrons discovered in the past two decades are tetraquarks or pentaquarks containing a charm quark and a charm antiquark, with the remaining two or three quarks being an up, down or strange quark or their antiquarks. But in the past two years, LHCb has discovered different kinds of exotic hadrons. Two years ago, the collaboration discovered a tetraquark made up of two charm quarks and two charm antiquarks, and two “open-charm” tetraquarks consisting of a charm antiquark, an up quark, a down quark and a strange antiquark. And last year it found the first-ever instance of a “double open-charm” tetraquark with two charm quarks and an up and a down antiquark. Open charm means that the particle contains a charm quark without an equivalent antiquark."
Breakfast time onomastics.

Well...I suppose they will be assigning them genders soon too. (Happy that we have not been sucked into an alternative dimension, at least so far...)
To: Pete from Shawnee Mission
I honestly can’t make heads or tails from it.
31
posted on
07/05/2022 7:28:22 PM PDT
by
rdl6989
( )
To: norwaypinesavage
32
posted on
07/05/2022 7:36:36 PM PDT
by
rdl6989
( )
To: rdl6989
What I worry about is scientists who think they know what they are doing making a bad mistake. Or, scientists who are so driven to push the boundries that they do not care about putting other people at risk. Or, some hidden agenda behind the scientific facade with bad consequences. (Q.v. CS Lewis’ “That Hideous Strength”.)
I am glad we have made it through today.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson