Posted on 06/29/2022 9:47:12 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
Researchers say they have found that levels of a specific protein appears to help accurately predict whether people with the wet form of age-related macular degeneration may need lifelong, frequent eye injections to preserve vision or if they can be safely weaned off the treatments.
Standard treatment of wet age-related macular degeneration requires monthly or twice-monthly eye injections of so-called anti-VEGF drugs that slow or stop the growth of leaky blood vessels and, in most cases, stave off further vision loss.
Sodhi's team found that relatively higher levels of angiopoietin-like 4 (higher than 4.22 ng/mL) accurately predicted actual clinical outcomes in the patient population, identifying with 91% sensitivity those patients who would continue to require monthly eye injections to preserve their vision.
To improve the accuracy of the prediction model, they paired measurements of angiopoietin-like 4 with VEGF, the protein specifically targeted by current wet macular degeneration treatments. With both proteins, the researchers were able to correctly identify with 76% sensitivity and 85% specificity patients who likely need monthly eye injections; this group of wet macular degeneration patients could benefit from newer longer acting anti-VEGF therapies.
…Mice that received either the angiopoietin-like 4-blocking RNAi treatment or the VEGF-blocking RNAi treatment, both had lower levels of abnormal blood vessel growth than mice which received control treatment. However, in mice that received RNAi targeting both VEGF and angiopoietin-like 4, the treatment showed an additive effect, with even lower abnormal blood vessel growth than RNAi targeting either protein alone.
As an alternative to using RNAi as a therapy, the researchers tested a naturally-found protein called soluble neuropilin, which the researchers have previously shown have a quenching effect on VEGF and angiopoietin-like 4 in studies in diabetes. The test yielded similar results as the RNAi, effectively treating the growth of the abnormal blood vessels..
(Excerpt) Read more at medicalxpress.com ...
I didn’t think there was much in the way of treatment for the wet variation of macular degeneration.
I have been getting eye injections for over 10 years. At first they were about 1 to 2 months apart, but about 2 years ago the eye was stable enough that they started spacing the injections out.
Now they are about 4 months apart. Over the years, there has been a half dozen times that the doctor also inserted an Ozurdex pellet in the eye in addition to the Lucentis shot.
This current treatment is expensive and slow, it would be a great savings for Medicare if a more effective drug was developed.
I was diagnosed two years ago, no one metioned the “wet” variation?
That’s wonderful — that you’ve been about to manage it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.