Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Brooklyn Attitude

Respectfully, I don’t see a chance in heck that the Court would cover up out of concern for a law clerk’s future. A leak like that is an irreparable violation of trust and makes the person inherently untrustworthy for all future employment. No degree of friendliness could justify that.

Now, it could have been a clerk and they are covering it up for some other reason, but I just don’t see them doing it to save a clerk’s behind.


41 posted on 06/28/2022 7:36:15 AM PDT by Stravinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Stravinsky

“Now, it could have been a clerk and they are covering it up for some other reason, but I just don’t see them doing it to save a clerk’s behind.”

I realize that and on second thought the probability that 100% of DemocRATS, Republicucks, and the media have suddenly grown a sense of decency is infinitely small. Therefore we are left with the cause being DOJ incompetence OR they know and won’t tell anyone because it hurts the Left.


43 posted on 06/28/2022 7:49:37 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (I went to bed on November 3rd 2020 and woke up in 1984.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Stravinsky

It is kinda amusing they have not announced the results of their “investigation”.

My guess—it was a clerk who is a member of American royalty aka BIPOC or pervert.


53 posted on 06/28/2022 2:04:35 PM PDT by cgbg (A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson