Replies

You can't just look at the final numbers, say they show a suspicious pattern, and overturn an election on that basis. You have to be able to point to specific individuals committing specific offenses that you can trace to specific vote totals.

You might want to look at this:

How Russia 'FAKED its Covid vaccine trial and made billions along the way': Scientists find 'ridiculous' anomalies in Kremlin jab data and say there's only a 0.02% chance trial results were genuine

You cannot overturn an election based upon a suspicion. That's why judges - including many appointed by Trump himself and including the US Supreme Court - rejected those claims.

The truth is that 20/20 was an anomalous year for elections because of covid, and because of the different rules states established for elections. It made the normal Democrat get out the vote drives much easier because they didn't have to drive people to the polls like they normally do. I know because I've been an observer and seen it. They just had to get them to open their mail. And they focused those efforts on urban districts because the greater population density meant it was easier to get more votes with the same amount of door to door effort.

Of course there was some fraud. The problem is that it is impossible to quantify how much of the unusual Democratic turnout was due to fraud, and how much was due to the rules that made voting much easier.

The entire argument that different voting patterns in 2020 proved fraud is simply ridiculous.