The truth is that 20/20 was an anomalous year for elections because of covid, and because of the different rules states established for elections. It made the normal Democrat get out the vote drives much easier because they didn't have to drive people to the polls like they normally do. I know because I've been an observer and seen it. They just had to get them to open their mail. And they focused those efforts on urban districts because the greater population density meant it was easier to get more votes with the same amount of door to door effort.
Of course there was some fraud. The problem is that it is impossible to quantify how much of the unusual Democratic turnout was due to fraud, and how much was due to the rules that made voting much easier.
The entire argument that different voting patterns in 2020 proved fraud is simply ridiculous.
"Overturn" is a lying propaganda word used by Democrats. Throwing it out and doing it over would be perfectly reasonable once it is discovered to be tainted with major fraud.
Of course there was some fraud. The problem is that it is impossible to quantify how much of the unusual Democratic turnout was due to fraud, and how much was due to the rules that made voting much easier.
Not impossible at all, just difficult, and for the various groups of people that have gone to the effort to prove it, they've found mountains of evidence of fraudulent voting.
Fake address, address of parking lots and commercial buildings, nursing home residents who are not of sound mind or catonic, ballot harvesting, fake ballots, and on and on and on.
Biden did not beat Barack Obama.
The entire argument that different voting patterns in 2020 proved fraud is simply ridiculous.
Disagree. Kiryandil has done fascinating work in tabulating the degrees of impossible crap that happened on a county by county basis.