As a Judge, I have the ability to monitor the results as the day progresses.
I have also verified the accuracy MANY times during the years I have been an Election Judge.
The machines in use utilize a Linux operating system.
The paper ballots are scanned in the top of the machine then saves them in the bin underneath, which is locked.
At the end of the day I close the polls at which time the results are printed twice and the USB drives save the results and are encrypted by the DS-200.
Chain of custody forms and locks are used with the drives and paper results.
I HAND CARRY THESE TO THE CENTRAL COUNTING CENTER.
My "day job" is IT, and have been in the IT biz for 40 years.
I do not have access to the source code so I cannot verify that there isn't any funny business in the program.
I have worked with these for 5 years and do not have any evidence of any vote-switching, or any other fraudulent results.
Thank you red-dawg for that fine comprehensive post. Seriously.
If I understand your comments …… you are not part of the vote verification ? Why not and who verifies ? If a crime occurs said crime would occur at verification ?
Thank you for the thorough explanation. You are an honest person. How would a dishonest person exploit this system?