Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This outpatient approach appears to get rid of the intermediate-risk prostate cancer, leaving the low risk cancer for continued “active surveillance.”
1 posted on 06/20/2022 9:17:18 AM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pete from Shawnee Mission; Mazey; ckilmer; goodnesswins; Jane Long; BusterDog; jy8z; ...

The “Take Charge Of Your Health” Ping List

This potentially high volume ping list is for health articles and studies which describe something you or your doctor, when informed, may be able to immediately implement for your benefit.

Now keeping a new list (“Common/Top Issues”) for conditions expected to only concern at least 1% of the population. Ask to be on either the “Common/Top Issues” or “Everything” list.

Please email or private message me if you want on or off of a list and of which list you desire.

2 posted on 06/20/2022 9:17:53 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

They use this type of ultrasound in cosmetic medicine to tighten skin.


3 posted on 06/20/2022 9:29:36 AM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

I had TULSA (Trans Urethral Ultrasound Ablation) of my Gleason 7/Stage I prostate cancer in Aug. of 2020, just FDA approved in Dec. ‘19. Out-patient....3 hour procedure.

Totally successful, not only no side effects - no pain or discomfort. PSA now .227. Computer-mapped & doc-controlled procedure in MRI to see results as they happen. You leave pain-free/discomfort free with catheter for 2 - 3 weeks.

Cannot recommend more highly.

https://tulsaprocedure.com/

Dr. Stephen Scionti one of first in nation to do it, now most experienced. Cannot recommend him & staff more highly. No - not paid for this.

https://tulsaprocedure.com/scionti-prostate-center/

PM me with any questions - happy to help.


4 posted on 06/20/2022 9:38:23 AM PDT by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

don’t want to control cancer by watching it grow; better to get rid of it period. One aspect of medicine’s attitude toward prostate cancer is to be too benign toward it. It’s generally said that it’s so slow growing that a man is virtually guaranteed five years of life after its discovery. And this is the basis of “active surveillance.” The problem with the approach is that the man continues aging toward that time when he’ll be told that he’s just too old for the surgery. Foolish to settle for the “five years” while it progresses to that stage that guarantees a horrible and painful death.


6 posted on 06/20/2022 9:50:04 AM PDT by DPMD ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind; All

I clicked both the top and bottom Medical Express links and they both delivered that same article about LIVER cells. Please post the correct link. The man I love is about to have prostate surgery for grade 2 and 3 malignant cells, and we need to have information about whether this other approach would be better.


9 posted on 06/20/2022 10:39:57 AM PDT by gleeaikin (Question authoritytQiviut )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

I recently (3 months ago) went from ‘Active Surveillance’ to MRI guided focal treatment. My focal specialist chose cryogenics instead of the ultra-sound, though he did both. He said I was an ideal candidate for the cryogenics. My PSA has dropped from a high of nearly 10 at one point, down to 2 now, the same as it was nearly 40 years ago. I switched from AS to the treatment after a change in PSA and MRI last fall.


11 posted on 06/20/2022 10:55:50 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Capitalism is what happens when you leave people alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

Bkmk


14 posted on 06/20/2022 2:16:46 PM PDT by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

I would never let them subject me to a prostate biopsy or even digital exam so I guess I’ll never know what killed me.


20 posted on 06/20/2022 5:44:22 PM PDT by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

Would playing AC/DC be better?


24 posted on 06/20/2022 7:22:42 PM PDT by minnesota_bound (Need more money to buy everything now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Admin Moderator; Chris Robinson

Please replace the link with this:

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-06-high-intensity-focused-ultrasound-hifu-prostate.html

The wrong study link is currently attached.


37 posted on 06/22/2022 6:05:46 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson