I feel dumb, but I felt like 2000 Mules talked about 2 different things but did not connect them.
1) Many mules in key areas delivered many ballots to many drop boxes in an organized campaign of voter fraud. This seems to have occurred over several days leading up to the election. Mules often worked at night to minimize recognition of the person and their activity.
2) On election night, many key areas mysteriously stopped voting, all at the same time, and when the counting started up again, Biden had somehow leaped ahead of Trump.
These are both important factors, but I do not think they are connected. The Mules were not dropping off ballots at 3:00 AM on Wednesday Nov 4. They did it days before the election.
Am I missing something? The movie did not exactly try to connect these 2 things, but it focused on the mules, and mentioned the stopping of the counting and, I think, implied some link. But I don’t see the link at all. I think they are separate methods of fraud.
I always keep in mind that Biden declared that his party had a 100 percent foolproof cheat machine firmly in place before 2020 election.
That pretty much answers the question of planned coordinated event.
Those are not connected at all.
“2000 mules” showed voter fraud before the election.
The sudden influx of ballots on election night show that all that voter fraud was not enough. Biden was trounced so badly that they had to make up 4 MILLION MORE ballots at 4AM to drag his carcass across the finish line
And it was actually 50,000 mules- only 2000 made D’Souza’s strict criteria, and those 2000 alone would be enough to change the election results.
Remember in Georgia when the ballot workers pulled out 3 caseloads of ballots in the middle of the evening after the observers were let go?
I agree. I think that the mules were not enough to swing the election, so they had to stop the voting and bring in the fabricated ballots. I think that they needed voting to be over for the fabricated ballots because they needed to use the voter rolls to assign the ballot to someone who had not voted.
They are indeed different methods of fraud. It would not be difficult for the FBI (if they wanted to) to determine why the voting was halted simultaneously in 5 states. The problem is not only were the election officials owned but also the DOJ was/is owned. Might as well use that old rag of a paper that has all of those antiquated amendments on it for some tinder to start a camp fire.
“These are both important factors, but I do not think they are connected.”
They’re not connected in that they aren’t identical methods. They are connected in that the same organizers implemented both.
The fraud of the drop-box mules, and stolen votes at nursing homes, etc., was supposed to have been enough to effect a cheated “win”. The shut-down of counting, and infusion of hundreds of thousands of ballots was their their contingency plan in case the mules weren’t enough.
Same s—t, same people, different method.
And the machines ...
The News Misleadia’s response to your message:
“These controversial claims are baseless, unfounded, and unsubstantiated. This is sweeping and systemic disinformation. These claims have been debunked, refuted, and completely put to rest. No credible evidence exists to support these shakey assertions, and numerous fact-checkers have marked these allegations as FALSE. Based on the reports of these fact-checkers alone, there is no further need to investigate these outlandish claims. They have been thoroughly discredited and contradicted. Continuing to push these far-fetched conspiracies, in the form of Russian lies, is sedition.”
“I think they are separate methods of fraud.”
Yes, there were several methods of fraud. A truck driver claim he delivered tens of thousands of ballots from New York. The machines may count correct (some say no), but the adjudication process (allowing someone to change the vote to anyone on the ballot) was corrupt and done in back rooms. And we also seen the video of the women running the same batch of votes multiple times. Military votes were transfer to a paper ballot by hand and often done outside a Republican witness. Nursing homes with ~100% vote for Biden. ~100% participation in dozens of precincts. So, etc...
If there was a way to cheat they did. Mules just concentrated on one aspect. True the Vote (mules data provider) says they have another big announcement soon that is even worse than mules.
In general, you are right. “2000 mules” focused on early election nights, not THE election night. Early elections also included the Ga runoff for senator.
There were two major components to what “True the Vote” did:
1. They obtained a pentabyte of data showing “pings” where cell phones were located during those nights. With that data they could show an individual’s route around the city. One that I remember was a guy in Atlanta who stopped at 24 ballot boxes and 5 “stash houses” in the dead of night. “Stash houses” provided multiple ballots, while ballot boxes were where they were submitted. The number put into each ballot box seemed to vary from about 5 to 12.
2. They obtained 4 million minutes of CCTV focused on the street ballot boxes. With that, they could show an individual, already identified from the “ping” data, actually putting ballots in the boxes. These individuals were wearing gloves and they would use their cell phone to photograph the ballots going into the boxes, because they were paid $10 per ballot stuffed.
In summary, individuals were shown going to 10 or more ballot boxes and placing 5 to 12 ballots in each, in the middle of the night (10pm to 5am) while wearing gloves and photographing each deposit.
What is the innocent explanation for this activity?
the way i see it is that the illegal ballots helped trip the algorithm in the machines to count them as more votes by hiding the switching of votes or over counting the biden votes.
it should all be looked at and when the pubbies take over congress and the senate, we the people need to demand this... pound of flesh time.
So, if you listened to the testimony of True to the Vote, and the evidence given in 2000 mules you missed somethings.
The ballots were being taken to DNC offices BEFORE being counted. They found this by the GPS tracking devices on the ballot boxes. What do you think happened there? Good things? By the time of Midnight the Democrats, with the help of digitized voter roles and real time computer tracking, KNEW who had voted and who had not. Then they just voted for people that had not. Plus, many times the ballots could be seen who was voted for. They could replace ballots, especially if they could ‘print’ signatures. This ALONE should have disqualified the election of 2020. In Wisconsin, the democrat operatives had unfettered access to the ballot storage in Milwaukee for weeks. Same things probably happened. The events about the ballot box diversion were demonstrated to be 7% in each state they looked at the GPS data. That means an organized multi-state effort.
I have posted before, I believe that the national voting “Pause” was pre-planned to allow the democrats to get the data from the voting roles and the signatures, about who had voted and who had not. They used that data, for the after midnight push of ballots. For this theory to work, they had to accept ballots in areas after they shouldn’t have been accepted, and counted those ballots that they shouldn’t have counted. That very thing happened and has been documented.
2000 mules has convinced me of one thing....Donald Trump wasn’t the biggest looser in the 2020 election. Democracy, from the usurpation of State Legislatures and their voting laws, to the outright denial of a democratic process for election, We the People lost.
The saddest part of the above, is that with the help of the DOJ, FBI, CIA, Courts, Congress, Media and even the Attorney Generals, they ABSOLUTELY will do it again. The biggest Civil Rights issue of our day is if “Voting” actually matters. Even the SCOTUS failed to protect the civil rights of every American in this regard.
The problem I see with Dinesh’s argument is that without being able to see any of the ballots dropped by the mules all that you have is the suggestion of vote fraud without the ability to prove it.
The inability to know if the ballots are good or not was the very reason to reject vote harvesting when it first started, here in California. California Democrats knew why they wanted it, the GOP as usual were too clueless to object. Once the practice was established here it spread around the country.
What is needed is a secure voting system like even impoverished Mexico manages to use.