Pro-abortion activists in blood-soaked outfits brandish toy DOLLS outside Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett's Virginia home and say ending Roe v. Wade will trigger spike in forced births

Daily Mail UK ^ | June 18, 2022 | Ronny Reyes

[griffin]

Yup!! Lord Willing!!! Let’s get those forced births agoin’!!!

[joma89]

Once again, leftists commit crimes out in the open and nothing happens to them. Gathering outside the house of a judge to affect a decision is a crime.

[lurk]

Slim chance these stunts will change the court’s ruling.

[griffin]

When the government refuses to perform key duties, advances evil, and prosecutes good, it is only a matter of time before they will be held accountable and all these lowlife dredge's of society are forced to scurry to obscurity again for generations.

The pendulum keeps swinging. Its just natural. And she is gonna be swinging hard.

[Sacajaweau]

these people should be looking at their state abortion laws. this show is nothing but disruptive and illegal.

[aquila48]

“Pro-aborition activists dressed in blood-soaked outfits...”

Was the blood from the latest child they butchered?

[DannyTN]

They are dressed appropriately for child butcherers.

[lee martell]

Looks like Judge Amy & family are virtually on House Arrest.
Were it my family, we would be living elsewhere at an ‘undisclosed location’. Living in home that must be surrounded by police 24/7 like palace guards is not natural for any American. Traumatic for those children to look out the front window, see all this foolish behavior, then see their parents appear to be helpless and unable to make those people go away.

[Mark17]

Protesters from the Rise Up 4 Abortion Rights group gathered outside Barrett's home in Falls Church, Virginia,

Isn’t that illegal? Oh, sorry, I forgot. Rats 🐀 can get away with anything.

[Gene Eric]

To Hell with them and their kill holes.

[metmom]

Blood soaked clothing is just right for anyone pro-abortion.

If women are that serious about not getting pregnant, they should get themselves fixed.

[metmom]

Once again, leftists commit crimes out in the open and nothing happens to them. Gathering outside the house of a judge to affect a decision is a crime.

Which differs from visiting the Capitol building of the government which represents we the people just how?

Oh wait. They are leftists.

A special privileged group for whom the laws do not apply as they demand for us.

[AlbertWang]

Protesting at the local mall is free speech.

Protesting like this at a Supreme Court justice’s home is political violence and intimidation.

Are we opposed to political violence? If so, we cannot be selective.

Lock them up.

[Hardastarboard]

Were I a member of the SC, I would be overwhelmingly tempted to walk around in my yard, casually doing chores with an AR-15 on a tactical sling, Israeli militia style over my back, wearing a mag belt with 8 or so spare 30 round mags. Just to make a casual point.

The media would have a collective hemorrhage about it, but the image broadcast throughout the world might give these Marxist weasels pause.

[Russ]

Why aren’t pro-life protesters showing up outside the homes of the liberal members of the court? It would be interesting to see what happens...

[Engedi]

If it was one of the Liberal Judges homes, neighborhoods, you know Police would have it blocked off, barricaded.

At any rate, Barrett has been a big disappointment in quite a few rulings; voting with the Libs. Hope she remembers how the Libs treated her and her family going forward.

[Mark17]

If it was one of the Liberal Judges homes, neighborhoods, you know Police would have it blocked off, barricaded.

If anyone tried to show up, they would have been arrested.

[FlyingEagle]

These unfortunate misguided protestors are in the grip of Satan.

[SisterK]

not the Bee