Pfizer admits to fraud in court

substack.com ^ | 6/16/2022 | Steve Kirsch

[ransomnote]

Their defense to the fraud claims against them is that because the government was in on it, it isn't fraud. Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson's attorney, Robert Barnes, isn't buying the argument.

Steve Kirsch

Jun 15

You really can’t make this stuff up. You gotta watch this video… it’s only 2 minutes. And it will be a key piece of evidence in my next move which you’ll learn about shortly.

In a nutshell, Pfizer admits in court to fraud, but says it isn’t fraud because the government was in on it. I bet you never heard that defense before.

[MHGinTN]

A novel approach to defending evil.

[Political Junkie Too]

I get it now...

2020 wasn't a stolen election because the government was in on it.

-PJ

[spacejunkie2001]

that’s great. they should be able to loop in the US gov as a co defendant if they were in on it.

[rightwingcrazy]

They only intended to deceive the public, not the government. And they deceived the public with the support and encouragement of the government. Maybe the law permits that? If not, who would enforce it? The government?

[dangus]

Not novel at all, sadly. The “victim” of this fraud is the government itself. So the fact that the victim was aware of the fraud means it wasn’t really fraud. Unfortunately, the courts don’t see those who were coerced as being victims of fraud, either, precisely because they were coerced, not deceived. You’re going to have to find an entire class of victims of people who willfully, gleefully took the vaccines, and only then questioned the government policy.

[Little Ray]

That’s actually what the SCOTUS said - if states want to violate their own election laws, it’s all good.

[mewzilla]

Thanks to the PREP Act, Pfizer may be right.

[JudyinCanada]

Well this makes perfect sense. If the government is involved, well of COURSE, it’s fraud. Duh.

[JoSixChip]

I guess were going to find out if Barns is as good as he has presented himself over the last couple of years. God! I hope he is.

[DugwayDuke]

It would be nice if they provided proof that Pfizer said what they accuse them of. All we have is their summary.

[Still Thinking]

How far up your azz does your head have to be to think that the state should get MORE trust and LESS accountability than Joe Sixpack walking the street???

[MHGinTN]

Far enough to watch your lips move, eh?

[antidemoncrat]

“Their defense to the fraud claims against them is that because the government was in on it, it isn’t fraud.”

Hell the same thing applies to the antifa and BLM riots. They are mostl peaceful protests or I’m sure the DOJ would have came after them.

[Still Thinking]

Yup! In a related feet of anatomical prowess, my dad used to threaten me that if I didn’t behave, he’d kick my ass up on my shoulders where I could use it for a collar button.

[JimRed]

Maybe the law permits that? If not, who would enforce it? The government?

Call out the militia to arrest, try and summarily execute THOSE WHO GAVE THE ORDERS.

[tallyhoe]

What was the fraud? Lying about??

[achilles2000]

Virtually everything that was said to the public about the experimental gene therapy was a lie, and the documents filed by Pfizer with the FDA disclosed to the FDA and government that the “vaccine” was neither safe nor effective and that no adequate trials were conducted.. Yet, Pfizer and the government went out and said the opposite and failed to disclose the horrendous risk posed by the vax.

Where are the Covidiot FR commenters? You know, the swine who denigrated the people who actually did enough research to know that the pandemic was a hoax and that the shots are poison....

[taxcontrol]

If fraud can be shown, then liability protections no longer apply and they are potentially on the hook for all vaccine damages.

[jpp113]

According to the PREP Act, there is no liability for anything but willful misconduct. IF the Govt. told them to misrepresent the vaccine effectiveness or safeness, it was not willful misconduct on Pfizer's part