Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pfizer admits to fraud in court
substack.com ^ | 6/16/2022 | Steve Kirsch

Posted on 06/16/2022 12:15:42 PM PDT by ransomnote

Their defense to the fraud claims against them is that because the government was in on it, it isn't fraud. Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson's attorney, Robert Barnes, isn't buying the argument.

You really can’t make this stuff up. You gotta watch this video… it’s only 2 minutes. And it will be a key piece of evidence in my next move which you’ll learn about shortly.

In a nutshell, Pfizer admits in court to fraud, but says it isn’t fraud because the government was in on it. I bet you never heard that defense before.



TOPICS: Conspiracy; Miscellaneous; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: chinavirusvaccine; kirschisanut; pfizer; robertbarnes; stevekirsch; stevenkirschagain; substackbuttcrack; whypostthiscrap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 06/16/2022 12:15:42 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

A novel approach to defending evil.


2 posted on 06/16/2022 12:22:41 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
I get it now...

2020 wasn't a stolen election because the government was in on it.

-PJ

3 posted on 06/16/2022 12:24:57 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

that’s great. they should be able to loop in the US gov as a co defendant if they were in on it.


4 posted on 06/16/2022 12:27:09 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

They only intended to deceive the public, not the government. And they deceived the public with the support and encouragement of the government. Maybe the law permits that? If not, who would enforce it? The government?


5 posted on 06/16/2022 12:30:58 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Not novel at all, sadly. The “victim” of this fraud is the government itself. So the fact that the victim was aware of the fraud means it wasn’t really fraud. Unfortunately, the courts don’t see those who were coerced as being victims of fraud, either, precisely because they were coerced, not deceived. You’re going to have to find an entire class of victims of people who willfully, gleefully took the vaccines, and only then questioned the government policy.


6 posted on 06/16/2022 12:34:37 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

That’s actually what the SCOTUS said - if states want to violate their own election laws, it’s all good.


7 posted on 06/16/2022 12:40:26 PM PDT by Little Ray (Civilization runs on a narrow margin. What sustains it is not magic, but hard work. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Thanks to the PREP Act, Pfizer may be right.


8 posted on 06/16/2022 12:44:36 PM PDT by mewzilla (We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Well this makes perfect sense. If the government is involved, well of COURSE, it’s fraud. Duh.


9 posted on 06/16/2022 12:46:29 PM PDT by JudyinCanada (Maranatha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I guess were going to find out if Barns is as good as he has presented himself over the last couple of years. God! I hope he is.


10 posted on 06/16/2022 12:48:39 PM PDT by JoSixChip (2020: The year of unreported truths; 2021: My main take away from this year? Trust no one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

It would be nice if they provided proof that Pfizer said what they accuse them of. All we have is their summary.


11 posted on 06/16/2022 12:58:15 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

How far up your azz does your head have to be to think that the state should get MORE trust and LESS accountability than Joe Sixpack walking the street???


12 posted on 06/16/2022 1:07:21 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

Far enough to watch your lips move, eh?


13 posted on 06/16/2022 1:12:35 PM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“Their defense to the fraud claims against them is that because the government was in on it, it isn’t fraud.”

Hell the same thing applies to the antifa and BLM riots. They are mostl peaceful protests or I’m sure the DOJ would have came after them.


14 posted on 06/16/2022 1:29:58 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Yup! In a related feet of anatomical prowess, my dad used to threaten me that if I didn’t behave, he’d kick my ass up on my shoulders where I could use it for a collar button.


15 posted on 06/16/2022 1:54:37 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy
Maybe the law permits that? If not, who would enforce it? The government?

Call out the militia to arrest, try and summarily execute THOSE WHO GAVE THE ORDERS.

16 posted on 06/16/2022 1:56:46 PM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Militia to the border! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

What was the fraud? Lying about??


17 posted on 06/16/2022 1:56:52 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallyhoe

Virtually everything that was said to the public about the experimental gene therapy was a lie, and the documents filed by Pfizer with the FDA disclosed to the FDA and government that the “vaccine” was neither safe nor effective and that no adequate trials were conducted.. Yet, Pfizer and the government went out and said the opposite and failed to disclose the horrendous risk posed by the vax.

Where are the Covidiot FR commenters? You know, the swine who denigrated the people who actually did enough research to know that the pandemic was a hoax and that the shots are poison....


18 posted on 06/16/2022 2:33:58 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

If fraud can be shown, then liability protections no longer apply and they are potentially on the hook for all vaccine damages.


19 posted on 06/16/2022 2:51:07 PM PDT by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
According to the PREP Act, there is no liability for anything but willful misconduct. IF the Govt. told them to misrepresent the vaccine effectiveness or safeness, it was not willful misconduct on Pfizer's part
20 posted on 06/16/2022 3:00:53 PM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson