I certainly will. As well as address the lies, accusations and other false notions you have regarding this issue.
First, let's set the stage. This entire debate centered on whether is it ethical to deny routine services to a patient who is unvaccinated.
I said it was unethical. I showed you proof from the AMA that they agreed it was unethical, and you concurred. It would not be ethical for a doctor to turn away a patient from an office visit solely on the basis of not being vaccinated.
Before you deny this, let me call attention to your post 106 where you said "I do not require my staff or employees be vaccinated, and I treat all patients regarding of vaccination status, or even more ethically challenging conundrums."
And my friend; this was all that needed to be said. I made the point, backed it up, and you agreed the point was correct.
But no... You evidently have a bug up your butt and you went off topic, you made a strawman argument by bringing in an unrelated gripe that you doctors "have been wildly abused, assaulted and slandered..."
So What? That complaint had nothing to do with the argument. Then your remarks got personal and nasty. You said you found it "ironic that you who believe you can force me to treat (again in a nonemergency situation not an emergent situation), you also believe you can demand what kind of treatment. You have no regard or consideration to my freedoms or expertise."
Then your angry bitterness against me was expressed this way: "And yet for those like you who call us quacks, idiots, Mengele and the other myriad of slanderous and libelous names, why demand we treat you?"
"Simply answer the questions", you demanded? Sure. Show me my post where I called you a quack, an idiot, Mengele, etc. Show Me!
Show me where I demanded you treat me. You already said you would, based on my nonvaxxed status, so why are you taking a hostile accusatory tone?
Now we move on to your post 111. Again, I remind you that the original point was made by me and accepted by you. In spite of your accusations in post 106.
Please tell me directly — do you think you are entitled to a physician’s care even if you if you do not agree with his treatment plan?
Yes. We've already seen that ethically a doctor must provide care even if the patient and the doctor disagree on treatment. We already know that if a patient does NOT accept and agree to that treatment plan, the doctor no longer has an ethical duty to treat.
Can you compel a physician to take care of you meaning you are entitled to his services regardless of your compliance or non-compliance with his recommendations?
See above answer.
Do you believe you are entitled to compel a physician to administer a treatment plan you demand, that he or she does not feel is proper?
See above answer.
Now before you make any further false allegations about me, or bring up any other strawman arguments, please calm down and figure out what is upsetting you so.
Is it because, as an apparatchik in the medical field, you were compelled to advance the Big Lie regarding vaccines, and now you're lashing out at the "I told you so"'s?
I reject your foundation. You are framing an argument falsely or in an attempt to advance your agenda. You are making invalid assumptions and cleverly cherry picking statements exactly as you did with the AMA.
And you did not answer my three questions directly. The entire preamble obviates a direct answer. So you are like an ex wife. You have to be right even when you are in agreement with a statement.
I will no longer respond because you clearly are dedicated to being correct and not engaging in a debate.
I would agree with you but there is no point in both of us being wrong. At least I can debate on the logic and merit of arguments. You choose to be emotional. Have a good evening. As we are at impasse I have other things to do.