1 posted on
06/01/2022 9:24:24 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
2 posted on
06/01/2022 9:29:20 PM PDT by
cgbg
(A kleptocracy--if they can keep it. Think of it as the Cantillon Effect in action.)
To: BenLurkin
3.5 billion for suits in 2034? Probably will end up costing 70 billion and delivered in 3420.
3 posted on
06/01/2022 9:30:22 PM PDT by
Nateman
(If Mohammad was not the Anti Christ he sure did come in as a strong second.)
To: BenLurkin
The moon will be made off-limits for human exploration before the decade is out, so why bother?
4 posted on
06/01/2022 9:41:12 PM PDT by
decal
(They won't stop, so they'll have to be stopped)
To: BenLurkin
Not going with Tesla...
Their space suits for transfer up to the ISS seem to do well. Why not let them take a crack at the EVA suits. I know they are more complicated but I would bet they could design a great and reliable eva suit.
5 posted on
06/01/2022 9:41:16 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: BenLurkin
Massive government graft and corruption. Plain and simple.
9 posted on
06/01/2022 9:49:32 PM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: BenLurkin
How many satellites, probes, rovers, and drones could we send to the other planets in our solar system for the cost of these suits which only protect astronauts from the lack of oxygen and radical temperature changes in outer space?
To: BenLurkin
spacesuits will have a more flexible fit for a wider variety of body types, addressing a criticism Oh the humanity, they didn't fit women. Let's spend a few billion more.
18 posted on
06/02/2022 6:40:02 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson