Supported by documentation, Fetzer argues that Sandy Hook Elementary, located in Newtown, Connecticut, was not even an operational school at the time of the shooting and hadn’t been since its closure in 2008 due to its “deplorable physical condition (both inside and out)” and its noncompliance with federal and state laws. In 2002, engineering consultants recommended the school district allot $4.5 million to “upgrade and renovate its heating and ventilation system” over a nine-month period beginning in 2010.
Two years later, the Newtown Board of Education was told the school, built in 1956, had a severely dilapidated roof, and in 2008, learned the facility was contaminated with asbestos, lead and PCBs under its foundation. Ten months after the shooting, the city approved a referendum to demolish and rebuild a brand new K-4 elementary school using a $50 million state grant.
Those hired to demolish the school were required to sign lifetime gag orders prohibiting them from discussing what they saw or didn’t see, writes Fetzer, adding:
If the city already knew in 2008 that the school was contaminated with asbestos and, in 2013, used the contamination to justify tearing it down, why would the same asbestos-contaminated school be safe for children and teachers to inhabit from 2008 through 2012? If SHES had remained open, wouldn’t the school district be sued for endangering public health?
More oddities surrounding the Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting include parents expressing no grief, donation websites created prior to the massacre, lack of emergency medical helicopters, ambulances forced to set up shop at the fire station located several hundred feet away and the government’s refusal to release the victims’ death certificates and burial sites.
Supporting the theory that the school had been closed since 2008, photographs illustrate hallways and classrooms stored with junk (furniture and office supplies), lack of handicap parking spaces and the absence of Internet activity from 2008-2012.
Using the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, Fetzer and his colleagues discovered the facility had NO Internet activity since 2008 when it was found to be contaminated with asbestos.
.........So, somewhere between five and seven minutes, Lanza was able to kill 26 people including himself – a 96 percent kill ratio – “which is unheard-of-accuracy even among experienced marksmen.” Professional military investigator and ballistics expert Mike Powers says the entire scenario is physically impossible, adding that Lanza’s slight build (112 lbs) would make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to carry the “heavy, bulky weapons and ammunition” he was reported to have used.
I have read the same things, and most came from a former Florida school safety expert who was investigating and asking questions. IDK if he has passed on or not, but I heard he was very ill a few years ago.