Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JonPreston

Maybe. But they also have every reason to lie since $58billion needs to destroy something, right?

Nato’s war on Serbia had similar claims. When the bombing stopped, Nato generals were amazed how little military targets they destroyed were actually ‘targets’ [for example, open a microwave door, turn it on, and it has the same electronic signature as ground radar for missles]. Nato was REAL GOOD at destroying hospitals, markets and passenger trains, though.

I remember “destroyed” Serb MIG’s being flown out of the war zone. So we’ll see, I guess.


15 posted on 05/26/2022 12:19:07 PM PDT by TonyinLA ( I don't have sufficient information to make an informed opinion said no lefty ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: TonyinLA

Big difference between high altitude bombings and squads on the ground using anti-tank munitions. Plus, nowadays we have endless amounts of video from the front lines showing the actual wrecked vehicles for confirmation.


37 posted on 05/26/2022 12:37:06 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: TonyinLA

Welcome to Free Republic and you’re fos.

The reason the NATO generals were able to reassess the damage after the war: NATO won.

Also interesting that the same people who call the Ukrainians nazis, are upset we bombed the Serbian nazis.


92 posted on 05/26/2022 1:39:24 PM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson