Posted on 05/14/2022 2:53:38 PM PDT by conservative98
You come across as mentally ill
Kathy…a couple days ago you said your DD214 covered 3 years of service & an HONORABLE discharge.
This DD214 doesn’t reflect either of those things. https://t.co/VwVfqecTi3— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
Yes! My goodness. Her discharge doesn’t say HONORABLE like she said it would. https://t.co/Ed9x6lhsWE— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
Absolutely. Her discharge status doesn’t say HONORABLE or reflect 3 years like she said. https://t.co/53zSaJ1A1z— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
I am not trying to tear anyone down. Kathy said her DD214 would reflect an HONORABLE discharge and 3 years of service.
It doesn’t reflect either of those things. My goodness. https://t.co/YDivaXy82W— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
Doesn't matter who anyone supports. Any candidate who can't validate their bio that they posted on their own website is held accountable. She said her DD214 would cover 3 years prior service. It doesn't.
Kathy Barnett supporters can't cry foul for her posting an erroneous bio.— Gunnery Sergeant Jessie Jane Duff (@JessieJaneDuff) May 14, 2022
No. It is NOT dishonest.
Kathy has said multiple times that her DD214 would reflect her first 3 years of service and an honorable discharge. Come on. She said this. It’s not dishonest to point out the discrepancy. https://t.co/MfUFtZw69f— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
Discharged as an E1?
There's no way she can win with this level of attack. Paging Sean Hannity!
I didn’t have time to examine this the other day. Looked funky to me
I would be looking for whether she washed out or quit basic.
First of all, we don’t know why her discharge says that. It’s commander’s discretion.
Second of all, and the MUCH BIGGER ISSUE is that SHE said that this document would reflect 3 years of service and an HONORABLE discharge.
This is not that! https://t.co/YqhHvsOT8h— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
I served in combat too. This is simply amazing to me.
We have someone running for US Senate who said that she had a DD214 that reflected her first 3 years of service & an HONORABLE discharge.
What I am saying is that the document she just released doesn’t say that. https://t.co/V4XjltVmWC— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
i cant keep up with all of this. somewhere I read you dont get that doc if all you were was a reservist for national guard
This is bonkers. I’m not accusing anyone of anything. I didn’t force her to say that her DD214 reflected 3 years of service and an HONORABLE discharge. https://t.co/u4Li3HK5o6— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
I spent 11 years, 3 months & 28 days on active duty before going 2 work 4 the Department of the Army as a civilian. Served in USAR as well. Retired w/42 years & 10 months combined Federal service. She's running on her military service. To be credible she needs to back it up.— The Fed Up Ex-Fed (@TheFedUpExFed) May 14, 2022
100% https://t.co/bsNEBtBh7O— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
Oh my goodness. No I am not.
Kathy said her DD214 would reflect an HONORABLE Discharge. It doesn’t.
Kathy said her DD214 would reflect 3 years of service. It doesn’t.
If she has another DD214 that shows what she said it would show, there would be zero issue. https://t.co/5xf1TVARul— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
the biggest question is one i saw on another thread...why is she hiding her husband. she left the military to marry him supposedly
Barnette had served for several years in the US Armed Forces Reserve. She was never activated, which is documented on her campaign website. Reservists who are never activated often do not receive a DD-214.
Still pushing deep state Clininista lies I see.
Something wrong with you.
I believe this is what a general, under honorable conditions DD214 looks like. But E1 after anything over 6 months indicates she was punished and reduced in rank before being discharged. Could be drugs or some other non-felony infraction. Certainly not something you want to brag about.
The separation authority was “AR 635- 200, CHAPTER 4,” and the separation code was “JBK.” According to Army Regulations, these designations mean that the veteran was involuntarily discharged for completion of required active service.
Basic training end dd214...u and the rest of u idiots are idiots.
She’s a nut.
I don't understand what people don't see. This is the 4 months AD that was reflected on the NGB22, presumably for BCT and AIT. We are still missing 3 years. The NGB22 does reflect honorable service but where are the three missing years?— Rob Kover (@PeakClownWorld) May 14, 2022
If the three missing years or OCS never happened, fine. Even if she washed out of OCS, fine. Just put it out there and move on. But here we are-statements on website still don't match the personnel records.— Rob Kover (@PeakClownWorld) May 14, 2022
EXACTLY! https://t.co/eDmzvK3qGT— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
Separation code LBK on a 214 just means Completion Of Required Active Service
Better this stuff comes out now when it can be dealt with than during the general election campaign.
Republicans are really good at blowing winnable senate races after someone wholly unelectable made it past the primaries.
Barnette's campaign needs to get on top of this stuff.
“i cant keep up with all of this. somewhere I read you dont get that doc if all you were was a reservist for national guard”
It’s easy. They are lying and distorting.
A release from ADT is not a discharge. She went from there to an AG unit in Alabama. Not all dd214 are created equal. I have a dd214 for completing ROTC prior to commissioning and attending Officer Basic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.