First of all, we don’t know why her discharge says that. It’s commander’s discretion.
Second of all, and the MUCH BIGGER ISSUE is that SHE said that this document would reflect 3 years of service and an HONORABLE discharge.
This is not that! https://t.co/YqhHvsOT8h— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
I served in combat too. This is simply amazing to me.
We have someone running for US Senate who said that she had a DD214 that reflected her first 3 years of service & an HONORABLE discharge.
What I am saying is that the document she just released doesn’t say that. https://t.co/V4XjltVmWC— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
This is bonkers. I’m not accusing anyone of anything. I didn’t force her to say that her DD214 reflected 3 years of service and an HONORABLE discharge. https://t.co/u4Li3HK5o6— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
I spent 11 years, 3 months & 28 days on active duty before going 2 work 4 the Department of the Army as a civilian. Served in USAR as well. Retired w/42 years & 10 months combined Federal service. She's running on her military service. To be credible she needs to back it up.— The Fed Up Ex-Fed (@TheFedUpExFed) May 14, 2022
100% https://t.co/bsNEBtBh7O— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022
Oh my goodness. No I am not.
Kathy said her DD214 would reflect an HONORABLE Discharge. It doesn’t.
Kathy said her DD214 would reflect 3 years of service. It doesn’t.
If she has another DD214 that shows what she said it would show, there would be zero issue. https://t.co/5xf1TVARul— Sean Parnell (@SeanParnellUSA) May 14, 2022