I guess that at some point I can understand these protests in general. I ask the rhetorical question of how this country got into a position where five people who went to law school and may or may not have earned anything useful get to determine the future course of the country?
There’s no requirement for SCOTUS justices to go to law school, or pass the bar, or pretty much anything. It’s who gets appointed and all political.
Well said....five judges should not decide abortion laws...which is the entire point of over-turning Roe v Wade. Don’t you understand that you are making the case against Roe V Wade? The voters in each state will decide about abortion should Roe V Wade be overturned....most (if not all) will undoubtedly have some sort of pro-choice law through the first 15 months. Abortions in the third trimester will likely be banned. Second trimester abortion laws will vey from state to state and flip back and forth in each state depending on who’s in charge that year and how badly the politicians want to divide us up and get us yelling at each other instead of paying attention to their terrible records.
My belief is that as science gets more advanced, abortion will likely become more and more abhorrent. Even current pro-choice people find the abortion practice abhorrent....even as they support it. Legalized abortion will probably go down as one of the worst policies ever embraced by the US....right up there with slavery.
And......wait for it.....300 years from now the people will be ripping down statues of Elizabeth Warren and Hillary Clinton because of their pro-abortion stance...they will not be judged in their time....they will be judged in contemporary times? That’s how the left likes it, right?
The bottom line is: the fire keeps on burning and the world keeps on turning.