If humans were anywhere close to redefining physics, there would be first proven scientific studies and papers, experiments and articles in journals that would be peer reviewed, some clue that some great innovation was about to occur. For something to just ‘appear’ that breaks all the rules of mechanics without any explanation goes beyond the sensible.
For those who think such leaps in tech could be achieved totally in black programs, not likely at all. Black programs occasionally develop new tech, but mostly its about the applications. Government labs do not have half the resources or brain power that the scientific community at large has. If we had ‘warp speed drives’ for example, those would not have been developed without some or most of the tech being proposed, studied, experimented with, in the open forums, again with publication and peer review.
I am not saying we know everything, but everything we observe, both here on Earth and as far as we can see into space is explained by laws or theorems of physics. Its the basis for everything we know from what we can build to our reasoning and thinking (for rational people anyway).
Not criticizing, just asking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HybPD0VsFP0
(Rupert Sheldrake—The Science Delusion)
The “laws” of physics are human laws.
Laws were made to be broken.
For all universal matter to have “simply come into existence” denotes that there is an unknown science beyond our conventional and observational “cause and effect” newtonian and quantum theoried physics as we understand it now. What we perceive now in the universe are the cause and effects that have since progressed, as described by our sciences, from the “genesis” of that PRIMARY imposition of some sort of grand primordial “somethingness” into the grand primordial “nothingness”.