Levin’s arguments were centered around Putin! Putin! Putin!, not Biden! for where were his statements about:
a.) Kids of multiple Dems and Repubs on energy boards in Ukraine. b.) Burisma. c.) Biden: fired the Ukranian prosecutor or no $1 billion to Ukraine. d.) Bioweapons labs. e.) Putin is an autocrat but Zelensky is also an autocrat who shut down all opposition political parties, left or right and shut down all media critical of him painting them with a broad brush. f.) Shortly after Trump was elected one can see that Dems and the libtard media had Russia on the brain even then as the Russia! Russia! Russia attacks started quickly and the fake information dossier was ongoing well before Trump was elected so Dems have been obsessed with Putin for a considerable amount of time. g.) The Obama-backed coup in Ukraine in 2014.
2.) Levin peppered his statements will Logical Fallacy “Enotional Appeals” and “Strawman” arguments on his show on TV tonight that was on a little while ago (rerun from earlier). Plus he used an Argument Based Upon Silence saying the word Nationalism was not in the Founders documents therefore they weren’t Nationalists.
Using Occam’s Razor, Levin:
3.) Created the construct of Nationalism/Marxism, supposedly arguing against both. But he exposed himself having Uniparty tendencies to some extent:
A Bush leaguer will come into office and argue against Marxism wwhile getting us involved in an interventionist war in Iraq via neoconism.
Then an Obama/Biden league type will get in office and argue against Nationalism and then bomb Libya, Syria (arming shady groups there), Yemen, etc, via neoliberalism.
When Trump was running for reelection, Bush came out of nowhere and made statements that hurt Trump and the Dems embraced him. Now Jeb Bush ia saying Trump needs to get out of politics.
And notice the globalists now are all in on Ukraine.
Excellent points, all.
Unreal to see the neocon globalists/neolibs line-up being supported, here, of all places.
Sorry, never been a Levin fan. He may be a great Constitutional lawyer, but he is not great on many other subjects.
This is the key point for me. Normally, I would be in favor of supporting a country from invasion, but not with active intervention unless our real national security is at stake, which it is not in Ukraine.
I refuse to ally with the likes of the Democrat Party (and their Republican assistants) Soros, Zelensky, Trudeau, and the Pope.
These people have repeatedly shown that they not only do not have the best interests of the United States at heart, but are antithetical to the existence of this country and the concepts from which it was founded.
I will not side with them. Ever.
Because every single thing they do is calculated to destroy this country.