The Wiki ‘editors’ could easily have added some detail (if they thought it was thin), and locked the page. But they pulled the whole thing.
Noted that the information was deemed bad not because it was not true. Also not because it was of no interest to anyone. Nor because it was too graphic or indecent. But it was removed specifically because it supported conclusions outside the allowable narrative. Orwell, it took an extra 38 years but the Ministry of Truth is here.
Wikipedia needs to suffer the fate of Netflix. Defund it. It’s the only way to remove the woke infestation.
wikipedia 4.23.22 reporting bb spawn doubleplusungood refs uncompany delete fullwise
So the article is deleted.
http://web.archive.org/web/20220420062123/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosemont_Seneca_Partners is tge wayback machine's last copy before Wikipedia shoved the article down the memory hole.
It redirects to Hunter’s article.
Another crooked broken propaganda website to avoid 🤪
Oh, how awful--a magnet for HB conspiracy theories! Oh, my!
Use of the term "conspiracy theory" is hereby seen to be used by black hats to cover up criminal misdeeds, just as it was when the CIA's infamous 1967 memo instituted and promulgated use of that and related variants to advantage their nefarious activities.
Rather than provide a shield for malignant deeds, use of the term "conspiracy theory" should be considered prima facie evidence of foul play. That should imply an invitation for closer examination from all potentially interested parties.