Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Third world dump politics: Why the hell is Marjorie Taylor Greene on trial?
American Thinker ^ | 23 Apr, 2022 | Monica Showalter

Posted on 04/24/2022 4:56:40 AM PDT by MtnClimber

With a red wave coming, desperate Democrats are now embracing the politics of Hugo Chavez.

And Iran's mullahs. And Vlad Putin.

Instead of running for office, and trying to persuade voters that their ideas are the best ones, which would involve defending their execrable record in power, they're opting to go the dictator's way, by trying to disqualify opponents from office.

Never mind what the voters think.

Which brings us to the outrageous show trial of pro-Trump Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene.

According to NPR's account: (NPR excerpt in post #1)

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: 1621; amytotenburg; communism; georgia; greene; marjorietaylorgreene; mtg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Pikachu_Dad

“Why did the judge allow this nonsense?”

That would be the liberal Jackass Feral Judge Amy Totenburg, a 71 year old Obama hag. She allowed this to proceed.


21 posted on 04/24/2022 6:38:33 AM PDT by Colo9250 (Somebody wake Trump up, McCarthy is a back stabbing traitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
They had many opportunities to shut NPR down and they never have. The main propaganda outlet for the left.

NPR should be shut down.

But realistic opportunities to do so?

I don't see many. It only takes a few RINOs to stop a near majority of Republicans from doing so.

All Republicans are not the same.

22 posted on 04/24/2022 6:47:37 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Pikachu_Dad; MtnClimber
Good question. Why did the judge allow this nonsense?

Read the 14th amendment section 3.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

The question I have is how such participation in "insurrection" is to be determined. Is a merely a civil suit sufficient to establish participation in an insurrection? I think not. The most serious problem with this clause in the 14th amendment is that it was applied to those who participated in the Confederacy's war against the US government, and that problem is that the 14th amendment was not ratified till 1868 which was 3 years after the Civil War ended. The US Constitution prohibits ex post facto laws.

I have argued previously on Free Republic that under the 14th amendment, John Kerry was not eligible to even be a dog catcher in Massachusetts, much less to be a US Senator, presidential candidate, or Secretary of State.

23 posted on 04/24/2022 6:52:55 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Make no mistake, calling January sixth an insurrection is entirely designed to keep Trump off the ballot as well as folks like MTG


24 posted on 04/24/2022 7:37:06 AM PDT by newzjunkey (“We Did It Joe!” -The Taliban / “Thanks Joe!” -Putin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Controversial Republican U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene

Really?

25 posted on 04/24/2022 7:53:18 AM PDT by sauropod ("We put all our politicians in prison as soon as they are elected. Don’t you?" Why? "It saves time.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

The conservatives show you who they will not defend.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

That should be “Republicans show you who they will not defend”

Republican does not equal conservative, even if they try to fool people with the label.


No it is all both conservative and Republican who let their fellows under attack twist in the wind. Shameful


26 posted on 04/24/2022 11:39:43 AM PDT by Chickensoup ( Leftists totalitarian fascists are eradicating conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson