Replies

You don't understand the purpose of VAERS or else there's some other reason you mindlessly repeat the same error. VAERS has functioned as a safety signal prior to Covid gene therapy shots. The practice was to watch VAERS, establish a threshold upon which a vaccine would be paused or withdrawn based on the number of reports received. For example, 50 reports of death post vax resulted in product withdrawal for further study in previous years.

Now that Covid 'vaccines' have sent the numbers for death, heart issues, paralysis, blood clots etc. off the charts (hundreds or thousands of times higher than all other vaccines), the CDC has created a fake safety threshold just for Covid 'vaccines' which cannot be crossed mathematically, this way no matter how many people die or are disabled by the Covid gene therapy shots, the CDC will still claim they are safe because the case counts didn't surpass the mathematically impossible safety threshold.

The safety signal is VAERS, by design, not your query about general population.

You don't understand the purpose of VAERS…

Simple question.

1) Can you provide any evidence that the vaccinated have a higher rate of problems than the unvaccinated?

And we all know VAERS can’t answer that question.

If the vaccinated don’t have more problems what are you worried about?

For example, 50 reports of death post vax resulted in product withdrawal for further study in previous years.

So you contend it didn’t matter what vaccine, the demographics of the vaccinated population, how many doses were given, what the cause of death was (accident, suicide, pre-existing condition), over what period of time the deaths occurred, or anything else, if there were 50 self-reported deaths sometime following the vaccination they would withdraw the vaccine.

That’s laughable.

Who designed that standard, an anti-vaxer?