Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: enumerated

Oh and now you run to insults.

Big difference between sand and votes. Plenty of people opt out of voting. They don’t find the candidates exciting, or even acceptable, and don’t vote. One year here in Tucson we had a really bad slate for the mayoral election, and on that same ballot was a raise for the mayor. More people voted against the raise than the COMBINED total for the mayoral candidates.

There’s simply no data out there that says a significant percentage, much less 100% like you ass-u-me, of Perot’s voters would have voted for Bush. The simple truth is he was a lackluster president who couldn’t keep his campaign promises and his 92 campaign limped around the country like a whipped dog. He didn’t move the voters. That’s why he lost.


57 posted on 04/12/2022 2:58:03 PM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

It really doesn’t bother me if you want to believe that.


60 posted on 04/12/2022 3:36:43 PM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: discostu

Rarely have I seen a candidate more eager to lose than Bush Sr in 1992.


67 posted on 04/12/2022 7:34:25 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Plugs the Pedo - The Shart Heard 'Round The World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson