You haven’t bothered to answer any of my questions. All you’re doing is ass-u-me-ing Bush “owned” votes. He didn’t. NOBODY owns votes until their cast. PROVE Perot voters would have voted for Bush. PROVE they would have voted AT ALL. Especially because you’re living entirely on percentages not vote count. It could easily be that nobody who voted for Perot would have voted in the election without Perot on the ballot, then Clinton gets over 50%.
You got one thing right. It ain’t rocket science. And the not rocket science says you ain’t proven nothing.
You are right, and I also can’t prove there will be sand on the beach next time I go to the NJ shore. But obviously there will be sand, right?
You sound like an idiot trying to dismiss something this obvious.
You have shown any proof either that Perot didn’t take away from Bush.
Perot wanted to balance the budget.
How was Clinton going to do that?
He was not. In fact his wife was charged with implementing universal health insurance. That played a huge role in the House flip of 94.
In January Clinton announced the era of big govt was over.
It’s also important to realize that CPD does not allow third parties to the left of the dem candidate. They allowed someone to the right of push to run. That’s obvious votes for bush.