Posted on 04/08/2022 5:45:21 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Well, obviously, RR, the CIA operative who approved the release of info was gotten at first by the aliens, positive proof that the aliens exist and are who we are being told they are (or so the Eraserhead guy on “The History Channel” who speaks for the aliens will say).
I’ve seen quite a few “UFO leaks from the Pentagon” in the past week.
I smell a rat. The ultimate “distraction” heading into the primaries. President Drooling Buffoon calls a press conference and introduces the world to the Ambassador from Alpha Centauri.
I would not put anything past these evil corrupt bastards.
When three are gathered in conspiracy, two will be government agents. ;^)
It is the drip, drip, drip form of “disclosure” that makes many of us suspicious.
That reflects a culture of secrecy—that “the elites” get to decide what we know and when we know it.
When they reject that culture and do a full data dump—then some trust could be restored.
Do you watch Chris Lehto’s youtube channel?
He’s a retired F16 pilot. Never saw a UFO but he analyzes the reports.
I am very skeptical about the time/distance argument used to rebut the possibility that we are being visited by aliens from a far away galaxy. Our understanding of physics certainly incomplete, and the argument is necessarily based on only what we know, but yet supposes absolute limitations based on what we do not know. For example, when astronomers considered the life span of our Sun in the 19th Century, they knew nothing of nuclear physics. The best explanation they had for its brilliance was that it was a lump of coal. Based on this, they thought that it had been burning for less than five-thousand years, and had perhaps another five-thousand years left to burn.
Though I am also suspicious, anything other than a “drip, drip, drip” approach could still risk panic and a market crash.
That said, even though he is broadcasting from Portugal, I wonder if he is still on the government payroll and undertaking to keep the "disclosure narrative" technically accurate.
“Panic and market crash” was the doctrine from the Brookings Report in 1960.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brookings_Report
It is obviously very dated—and its conclusions are highly debatable.
At this point it is just a lame excuse for continuing secrecy and coverups.
On top of that, I think it would be hard for anyone to gauge its effect on the upcoming election.
I completely agree with you. I have a lot of questions about what we think we know about the universe and Physics across the universe. Space is expanding and within that expansion light travels at a constant speed but can be manipulated by gravity? At what speed is space expanding? (for instance). Does gravity behave the same way related to mass in all parts of the universe or the even our galaxy? We determine and measure most of what we know about the universe based on what we have been able to observe and experiment with in our tiny little solar system.
Knowing that everything in the universe is moving while “space” is expanding makes finding a truly stationary point of reference impossible over a period of time to consider long distance travel. That is, unless we presume that there is a way to instantly travel to a spot in the universe.
If we want to create theories to explain what our known science can’t, we can assume spiritual beings, trans-dimensional beings, and all sorts of fun stuff.
I enjoy considering the potential and imagining the incredible. But, even with the multitude of questions about the science we know, I can’t conceive a pseudo scientific way that advance species could communicate and interact physically.
On top of that, Wall St analysts barely understand the market and Washington has no fricken idea.
Let me give you an example.
Let's say that the public is told that our world is interacting with an extremely technologically advanced group of beings (from whatever dimension or world). Now consider that our stock markets are nowadays largely driven by our own developments in "high technology."
What would that mean to you and me as we sit on retirement accounts invested in the market? Would we think it might be a good time to sell and sit on cash for a while? Now add about a million other similar investors and money managers to that group.
If, all of a sudden, our civilization were to meet up with a civilization greatly more technologically advanced than ours (even if they were friendly), our entire way of life would be threatened.
Why buy that new car or that new house next week? Better to wait and see what the hell is going to happen next.
In fact, perhaps we should rush to the grocery store and buy some basics before the manure REALLY hits the fan.
At this point the mass media and mass entertainment have been thoroughly soaked in the world of “ET”—we are talking six decades of this stuff.
That is why the latest “revelations” are being greeted with big yawns from sea to shining sea.
ET existence or contact does not mean that any new technology will be either usable or shared that would affect the markets—that is a wild assumption.
My view is that “they” have always been here. The only difference these days is that our technology is getting better at detecting them.
Imho the markets would greet disclosure—even full data dump disclosure—with a big yawn.
Complete and utter bullshit. And you know it.
Heheh.
Like the mere rumor of shortage emptied the toilet paper shelves at Walmart for weeks and weeks.
You need to reconsider your closely-held beliefs on this matter.
HOW did these people “interact” with UFOs?
Was it a “sexual” interaction?
@00:32 In his most recent video he says he doesn’t speak for the government and has no affiliation.
But, if he were in the employ of, say, an intel arm of the government, he might not be at liberty to disclose such.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.