So the Universe is unstable?
Like Sheldon 🤪
"Multi-Pass."
These, as yet unconfirmed results...
A few dozen people on the planet with the appropriate degrees will be gobsmacked by these results. The other 99.99993% of humanity will simply pay more for gas.
Entanglement alway makes things more interesting.
More “settled science” going down the tubes.
Calibration over temperature range for sensors and measurement devices is always the first place to start. That happened with the free-energy fusion hysteria about 30 years ago.
Yikes!
If true, will have to figure out what to do with a couple of my T-shirts...
Like the energy required to initiate creation of a black hole.
How many people at Fermilab have been vaxed?
I’ve been saying this since grade school.
But nobody would listen.
The “obesity epidemic” strikes again!
W Bosons could be related to LENR.
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6620-what-should-we-do-next-a-relevant-question-from-matt-trevithick/?postID=170097#post170097
...it appears that electrons and/or ball lightning can cause a fusion/fission sequence. As has been shown in work of Ken Shoulder and numerous reports of high voltage arcs by the Russians.
So, what happens? Think of physics as quantum field theory and accept the standard model as a starting point. Then we need to deviate because large clusters with a charge to mass ratio of an electron isn’t in the above physics. Rather bosons in quantum field theory are complex wave patterns in the field. We note that the weak force involves the W boson which has a charge. The decay of this complex wave pattern results in an electron, an antineutrino and energy. That energy is associated with the electron and the antineutrino unequally and with no specific values per particle. One suggestion therefore is that W boson is an electron with a complex wave pattern in a quantum field. If so then, something like a W boson might be created from the type of experiments above and perhaps also by various experiments by LENR experimenters.
I have analyzed electric arc experiments. Particularly one by R Santilli in Deuterium contaminated with some atmospheric air.
https://patentimages.storage.g…ade2b/US20180322974A1.pdf
That analyst proposes fusion/ fission occurs due to W bosons in a form I call a W wave. The formation of W bosons allows electrons to become Ken Shoulder EVOs. It’s a balance between electron repulsion and a local gravity cause by special relativity. These W-boson based clusters can collide with atoms and penetrate to the atom’s nucleus which causes an excitation which is expressed as a supermagnetic atom. Supermagnetic atoms can bond one with another as a magnet to a magnet to make what R Santilli calls magnecules. A cluster of supermagnetic atoms is catalytic for the fusion/ fission sequence. Using the assumption of supermagnetic atoms I did a mass balance on R Santilli data and found that the nuclear composition changed as follows in ppm: Nitrogen 9061, Oxygen -4805, Hydrogen 9793 and Deuterium -29877. This data is accurate to 3 ppm. Hence, the stiochiometry is 7 atoms of deuterium and one atom of oxygen combine to form 2 atoms of nitrogen and 2 atoms of hydrogen. If you examine proposed cascade of reactions which occurs in supermagnetic clusters of deuterium and oxygen you will find a resemblance to one of the cycles reported for fusion in star. The cluster catalyst model is a good fit for most of the proposed LENR results on this forum.
A deeper look at my report shows, as claimed also by R Santilli, that this type of fusion occurs in thunderclouds. When fusion/fission is a result of an electric arc in water, a gas is formed which can be used as a fuel. Again refer to my analysis, heat/torque produced by the gas in an engine test exceed the thermodynamic projections of energy content based on NASA chemical analysis by 40/13.2. Sadly, based on mass loss during transmutation and current physic paradigms, the energy yield should be much higher and should not be preserved as a fuel.
Where most LENR forum participants focus on new lenr nuclear reactions, I have chosen to focus on why the above nuclear reaction is so different from expected and how to detect the mass output (or fuel) and convert it back to energy.
Give it time but maybe Twitter and Instagram will start banning scientists for violating official theories. It’s the New Science.
They must have used metric instead of Imperial.
Were they using Dominion servers?
“the mass of a sub-atomic particle is not what it should be”
It’s a tranny particle?
Did God make a mistake? /s