Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shock result in particle experiment could spark physics revolution
BBC ^ | 04/07/2022 | Pallab Ghosh

Posted on 04/07/2022 3:14:55 PM PDT by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: BenLurkin

W Bosons could be related to LENR.
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/6620-what-should-we-do-next-a-relevant-question-from-matt-trevithick/?postID=170097#post170097

...it appears that electrons and/or ball lightning can cause a fusion/fission sequence. As has been shown in work of Ken Shoulder and numerous reports of high voltage arcs by the Russians.

So, what happens? Think of physics as quantum field theory and accept the standard model as a starting point. Then we need to deviate because large clusters with a charge to mass ratio of an electron isn’t in the above physics. Rather bosons in quantum field theory are complex wave patterns in the field. We note that the weak force involves the W boson which has a charge. The decay of this complex wave pattern results in an electron, an antineutrino and energy. That energy is associated with the electron and the antineutrino unequally and with no specific values per particle. One suggestion therefore is that W boson is an electron with a complex wave pattern in a quantum field. If so then, something like a W boson might be created from the type of experiments above and perhaps also by various experiments by LENR experimenters.

I have analyzed electric arc experiments. Particularly one by R Santilli in Deuterium contaminated with some atmospheric air.

https://patentimages.storage.g…ade2b/US20180322974A1.pdf

That analyst proposes fusion/ fission occurs due to W bosons in a form I call a W wave. The formation of W bosons allows electrons to become Ken Shoulder EVOs. It’s a balance between electron repulsion and a local gravity cause by special relativity. These W-boson based clusters can collide with atoms and penetrate to the atom’s nucleus which causes an excitation which is expressed as a supermagnetic atom. Supermagnetic atoms can bond one with another as a magnet to a magnet to make what R Santilli calls magnecules. A cluster of supermagnetic atoms is catalytic for the fusion/ fission sequence. Using the assumption of supermagnetic atoms I did a mass balance on R Santilli data and found that the nuclear composition changed as follows in ppm: Nitrogen 9061, Oxygen -4805, Hydrogen 9793 and Deuterium -29877. This data is accurate to 3 ppm. Hence, the stiochiometry is 7 atoms of deuterium and one atom of oxygen combine to form 2 atoms of nitrogen and 2 atoms of hydrogen. If you examine proposed cascade of reactions which occurs in supermagnetic clusters of deuterium and oxygen you will find a resemblance to one of the cycles reported for fusion in star. The cluster catalyst model is a good fit for most of the proposed LENR results on this forum.

A deeper look at my report shows, as claimed also by R Santilli, that this type of fusion occurs in thunderclouds. When fusion/fission is a result of an electric arc in water, a gas is formed which can be used as a fuel. Again refer to my analysis, heat/torque produced by the gas in an engine test exceed the thermodynamic projections of energy content based on NASA chemical analysis by 40/13.2. Sadly, based on mass loss during transmutation and current physic paradigms, the energy yield should be much higher and should not be preserved as a fuel.

Where most LENR forum participants focus on new lenr nuclear reactions, I have chosen to focus on why the above nuclear reaction is so different from expected and how to detect the mass output (or fuel) and convert it back to energy.


21 posted on 04/07/2022 3:38:13 PM PDT by Kevmo (Give back Ukes their Nukes https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4044080/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Give it time but maybe Twitter and Instagram will start banning scientists for violating official theories. It’s the New Science.


22 posted on 04/07/2022 3:40:05 PM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They must have used metric instead of Imperial.


23 posted on 04/07/2022 3:40:49 PM PDT by minnesota_bound (Need more money to buy gas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

tats a really nice statement

in the real world they act like its absolute and dogma

until they have to admit its notmso

global warming

this idiotic covax response

dont forget there was a scientific community scandal to cover up their data manipulation - lying - to make it appear that it was true

these people are regular people, subject to the same flaws and egos and are not higher moral character than anyone else, they wanted money coming in and wanted to publish papers and make names for themselves and develop patents and make money off patents

its all real nice but even feynmann fot a million bucks for his nobel prize, dont think some are motivated just for the money and accolades, and to hell with real scientific pursuit of truth and understanding

you know the dam biased livtard journalists speak flowery statements about their profession too and thats total bullshiite


24 posted on 04/07/2022 3:41:38 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound

If they parked that W boson outside overnight, they’d come back to find its windows broken, the radio gone and the whole thing up on blocks with the wheels missing.


25 posted on 04/07/2022 3:45:42 PM PDT by Noumenon (Black American flag time. KTF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"No-one was expecting this. We thought maybe we got something wrong."

Were they using Dominion servers?

26 posted on 04/07/2022 3:46:31 PM PDT by G Larry (Anybody notice that Satan is hard at work?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

twice.


27 posted on 04/07/2022 3:54:07 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Instead of Build Back Better, how about put it back the way you found it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“the mass of a sub-atomic particle is not what it should be”

It’s a tranny particle?


28 posted on 04/07/2022 3:59:14 PM PDT by dynachrome ("I will not be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Did God make a mistake? /s


29 posted on 04/07/2022 3:59:34 PM PDT by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They misunderestimated the W boson?


30 posted on 04/07/2022 4:00:08 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The lefties and pedo-friendlies might soon announce that this is proof of a NEW CHROMOSOME!!
Chromosome W.
It is used in the non-racist equation X+Y=XW, except when it equals WX. And XY divided by W is the hypotenuse of the papoose.


31 posted on 04/07/2022 4:00:14 PM PDT by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Sort of. Prior experiments and equations gave them an idea of what it “should” have been... Turns out... It’s beyond the “margin of error” heavier.

Whoops...


32 posted on 04/07/2022 4:21:37 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Then what happens when two bosun’s mate?


33 posted on 04/07/2022 4:25:13 PM PDT by deks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

34 posted on 04/07/2022 4:25:42 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: deks

Must be in the British Navy. “Rum, sodomy, and the lash.”


35 posted on 04/07/2022 4:26:57 PM PDT by dynachrome ("I will not be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

It’s strategery...


36 posted on 04/07/2022 4:27:27 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2

That is scientism as a framed definition, right there.


37 posted on 04/07/2022 4:33:23 PM PDT by Kevmo (Give back Ukes their Nukes https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4044080/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I love a good strategery


38 posted on 04/07/2022 4:33:49 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

WHAT, *real* science is never “settled?” It CAN be questioned? Nobody’s getting butthurt or screeching, “Right wing conspiracy theorist!” “Denier!”


39 posted on 04/07/2022 4:38:04 PM PDT by Big Brother Go to Hell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“a sub-atomic particle is not what it should be. “

THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED!!! Oh wait. Only “climate science” is non debatable.


40 posted on 04/07/2022 4:43:19 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson