WAKE UP and Smell the Burning of Our Constitution (International Health Regulations, World Health Assembly to vote May 22-28, 2022)

substack.com ^ | March 31, 2022 | James Roguski

[ransomnote]

The United States has proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations which will be voted on by the World Health Assembly scheduled for May 22-28, 2022.

James Roguski Mar 31

 

This is the fourth article in this series.

1. Pandemic Treaty

2. The People’s Treaty

3. Speaking Truth To Power

4. WAKE UP and Smell the Burning of Our Constitution

5. Abolish the WHO

6. Pandemic Mitigation Project

7. An Open Letter to the WHO

 

Share

Please watch the video below…

https://www.bitchute.com/video/TLdfX2WtackG/

KEY TAKEWAYS:

• The International Health Regulations (IHR) are legally binding and supercede the United States Constitution. All the nations of the world have already agreed to the existing International Health Regulations.

• The United States has proposed amendments to the legally binding International Health Regulations that will be voted upon at the next World Health Assembly this May 22, 2022 to May 28, 2022.

• These proposed amendments will cede additional sovereignty, control and legal authority over to the World Health Organization.

• These amendments will NOT require approval by 2/3 of the United States Senate. If they are approved (as submitted by the United States) by 2/3 of the member countries of the World Health Assembly (130 of 194 countries), these amendments would enter into force as international law just six months later (November 2022).

• It is not known if the amendments will be voted upon individually or as a complete package.

• The amendments will give the Director General of the WHO the power to unilaterally declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) even over the objection of the country dealing with an outbreak of disease.

• According to changes made to U.S. regulations that were published one day before Donald Trump was inaugurated (January 19, 2017), the definition of a “Public Health Emergency” in the United States now includes the declaration of a PHEIC by the WHO.

• A unilateral declaration of a PHEIC by the WHO will enable the declaration of a Public Health Emergency by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.

• The amendments proposed by the United States would also give the Director General of the WHO the legal authority to unilaterally issue an “intermediate public health alert (IPHA).” The criteria for the issuance of an IPHA is simply that “the Director-General has determined it requires heightened international awareness and a potential international public health response.”

• The amendments will also give “regional directors” within the WHO the legal authority to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC).

• Yes people, the United States wants to hand over our sovereignty to Regional Directors at the WHO and give them the power to “PHERC” us and “PHERC” the world, one region at a time. “PHERC” that!

MUCH MORE AT LINK: WAKE UP and Smell the Burning of Our Constitution (substack.com)

[C210N]

legally binding and supercede the United States Constitution...

What's legal (Admiralty Law) is NOT lawful (God's Law), and what's lawful is NOT legal.

The only thing that would be LAWFULLY binding on the Organic 'We the People' Constitition is a new Treaty, ratified by congress.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

Unless a treaty is reviewed and passed by Congress,
it is nothing more than a 'suggestion'.

[rlmorel]

If this is not a real treaty, can’t it just be withdrawn from by the next President?

Is this going to go in front of the Senate? I just cannot imagine a 2/3 vote majority.

Not that it makes a difference anymore.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

Oh, it's from the World Health Organization !
You remember them, right ?
They covered for the Chinese government when the Chinese lied about covid transmission.

[Amendment10]

From related thread...

The Supreme Court has already said no to corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification feds using federal treaty power as a backdoor to effectively expand the federal government's constitutionally limited powers.

"The obvious and decisive answer to this, of course, is that no agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or on any other branch of Government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution." —Reid v. Covert, 1957.

Corrections, insights welcome.

Patriots are reminded that they must vote twice this election year. Your first vote is to primary career RINO incumbents. Your second vote is to replace outgoing Democrats and RINOs with Trump-endorsed patriot candidates.

Again, insights welcome.

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "Unless a treaty is reviewed and passed by Congress, it is nothing more than a 'suggestion'."

Yeah, same as a mandate.

[Harpotoo]

You think the ruskies or PRCs would respect that?-)

[packagingguy]

“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

US Constitution

It looks as though treaties do not make the Constitution subservient. The subservient clause appears to reference the constitutions and laws of States, not those of the Federal government.

[Bob434]

[[If this is not a real treaty, can’t it just be withdrawn from by the next President?]]

There was soemthign that obama did that trump had a dickens of a time undoing that was not a treaty - obama got our nation into soemthing- can’t remember what now- and he did so without congress-

[ransomnote]

They’ve taken so much of our freedom from us just via the MSM and other Deep Staters portraying us as insane insurgents if we don’t obey made-up rules. They want to make up a new rule and have their puppets all claim we are terrorists if we don’t follow the new overlords at the World Health Organization. (Too) Many in America would ‘obey’.

[rlmorel]

Could have been the Paris Climate Accord (I loved Trump for just pulling the plug on that) or the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty which was a real treaty (I think) that we had proof the Russians were violating. When they refused to provide concrete information proving they were in compliance, that met the requirement for a withdrawal and Trump did it.

That is why we supported him. He DID things that SHOULD have been done.

[GrumpyOldGuy]

Add that to the list that can KMA.

[rlmorel]

Also, he withdrew from the Universal Postal Union (Treaty of Bern 1874) which the Chinese Communists were using to great effect to smash us over the head.

[rlmorel]

The Universal Postal Union was an interesting one.

Have you ever noticed the weirdness with shipping things to and from China?

I did, and it started to piss me off. (NOTE: I wrote this back during the Trump Presidency a few years back)

I went to a website at random called ONLINE SHIPPING CALCULATOR to compare the cost of shipping a 1 lb. package from Washington DC to Beijing, and then compared to shipping the same 1 lb package in the reverse, from Beijing to Washington DC:

What is behind this BS is called the Universal Postal Union.

I knew nothing about this, then stumbled across it by accident some years ago. It has the word "union" in it, which is repulsive enough in most industrial contexts, but otherwise sounds innocuous.

It is NOT innocuous, and the Communists in China have been milking this for all it is worth and more.

The Universal Postal Service was brought into being by The Treaty of Bern in 1874 with the ostensible and laudable goal of making sure that mail could be sent between countries around the world without worrying about mail being returned to to insufficient postage because the cost of delivering mail in the receiving country might be far above that in the sending country.

From the Wikipedia entry on the Universal Postal Union:
The treaty provided that:

• There should be a uniform flat rate to mail a letter anywhere in the world
• Postal authorities should give equal treatment to foreign and domestic mail
• Each country should retain all money it has collected for international postage.

One important result of the Treaty was that it was no longer necessary to affix postage stamps of countries that a mailpiece passed through in transit. The UPU provides that stamps from member nations are accepted along the entire international route.

This all sounds absolutely great. Then, in 1948, the Universal Postal Union became a "specialized agency" of the United Nations when it was founded. And like every damned thing the UN has touched, the International Grifters known as the UN, Leftists all, decided in 1969 to implement "Terminal Dues" which took into account the tonnage/volume shipping between countries and...to "equalize" things and "help" developing nations, they instituted a standard progressive system of Terminal Dues, and assigned countries a value that indicated their degree of advancement.

United States would be a Tier I country, and back then, a country like Communist China would be a Tier III.

This meant that in addition to a simple disparity in volume of mail shipped to determine the "Terminal Dues" paid, there was also a Marxist element that required Tier I countries to pay MORE per volume/tonnage disparity. Before 1969, it was a straight up "Terminal Due" based on simple measurement of disparity in volume or tonnage.

After 1969, If you were a Tier III like Communist China, you paid X $ "Terminal Dues" for each unit of measurement. However, if you were a Tier I like the United States, you paid X $ times whatever the tier multiplied your "Terminal Dues" by, just to "equalize" things between wealthier and less wealthy nations.

I had to poke around to find this, but this document defines the tier system that determines who is the taxpayer (such as the USA) and who is the grifter who takes advantages of the subsidies provided to them by the Universal Postal Union: LINK TO UPU DOCUMENT: Classification of countries and territories for terminal dues and Quality of Service Fund (QSF) purposes for the 2018–2021 period

How Marxist of them.

And lest the lesson be lost in this current push to implement a international corporate tax to be paid to the UN, you can look to history to see just how these International Grifters handle these types of things with no elected representation: In 1974 they tripled this "Terminal Dues", and in 1979, tripled it again. Then in 1984, increased it again by 40%. This is how THEY do taxes.

---

IMPORTANT:
But back to the subject at hand. For the Communists making cheap, crappy goods, there is such an imbalance of shipping costs that it is wholly impractical for consumers to ship many defective goods back to the manufacturer in Communist China. The cost of return shipping often outstrips the cost of manufacture and distribution paid by the consumer, so most people don't bother.

Think about that. How much money do many Communist Chinese manufacturers save on their Customer Service departments? Think of what happens when you ship a item back. Someone has to receive it. Someone has to move, label, inventory, and store it. In better companies, they might do analysis on it. And then there is the supply of a new, hopefully better working product that must be manufactured, packaged and shipped back to the consumer.

The logistical tail is huge. Think of how many Communist Chinese companies simply dispense with this. That is a significant cost. Significant. Anyone who has dealt with Chinese customer service knows it is extremely spotty. More expensive items do better, cheaper items have crappy or wholly non-existent customer service. In many cases, you cannot even contact them.

---

When President Trump took office, surely someone who understands business better than 99.999% of the people governing us, and better than 100% of the people who populate the UN, he was likely fully aware that we as taxpayers pay a subsidy to China (via the Universal Postal Union at the UN) to give them a significant and unfair competitive advantage, and announced he was going to withdraw the US from the Universal Postal Union. That completely threw them into an uproar "How dare he protect the interests of his own citizens!" This article from the Heritage Foundation describes it a bit: The Heritage Foundation: A U.S. Victory at the Universal Postal Union

Granted, it wasn't a complete victory to me. That would have been an elevation of China to Tier I, a simple withdrawal. The Communists still get their ill-gotten subsidy from the UPU, and we pay a little less, but we still pay.

Personally, I look to President Trump's approach to this subject of UPU Terminal Dues in the "Trade War" as evidence he was really in this fight for his country, and why so many of us admire him so much and are outraged by this fraudulent election.

[Bob434]

it mighta been that- i cna’t recall now

[Bob434]

wow- i didnt even know about that one- liberals are scum

[rlmorel]

That was a real eye-opener researching that one.

[combat_boots]

Small Arms?

[C210N]

Interesting, very interesting.

$1064 to ship on empty cargo ships that have to return anyways, versus $154 on full ones bursting at the seams.