Posted on 04/02/2022 6:10:06 PM PDT by ransomnote
https://briancates.substack.com/p/did-the-dojs-inspector-generals-office?s=w
Did The DOJ's Inspector General's Office Try To Pull A Fast One on Special Counsel John Durham? If So...It Did **NOT** Go As Intended "Snip.... The DOJ OIG tried to hide all material related to a meeting that former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann had with Inspector General Horowitz about an OIG employee's computer supposedly being connected to a foreign VPN, and it was Sussmann's own attorneys that alerted Durham to this omission.
But that wasn’t all!
The OIG also tried to claim it had told Durham 4 years ago that it had former FBI General Counsel James Baker's phones. But then the OIG somehow "forgot" to mention this when the Durham SCO specifically requested all discovery material related to Sussmann's case last October. ...Snip" more at link
Yeah I hate when a bad source gets legs. Anons always take things with a grain of salt. I do believe this one is worth pursuit. If this is true then that makes US/NATO meddling in Ukraine affairs highly visible, and the Russian aren’t going to like that at all.
That’s hilarous! Thank you!
LEX
EarthSky-- conjunction of Mars and Saturn
Ref Durham investigations: If it is found out that there were indeed obstruction of justice issues which delayed the investigation, is it possible to extend the statute of limitations once the prosecutor reasonably finds out that stall tactics were used, and the prosecutor only recently found out?
They thought they could because they always have. They had gotten to the point of not going to much effort to hide it. They severely underestimated DJT.
Now they are in so deep they have no choice but to double and triple down. They know the penalty for treason and sedition.
“ No, her vanity destroys her credibility”
Concentrating on the irrelevant destroys YOUR credibility. Judge the message, not the messenger.
There are people inhabiting all walks of life. Dismissing her for your reasons diminishes us all, and is not very godly. The world would be a better place if everyone, from every walk of life felt as strongly about the subject of her sign as she does. Did Jesus turn his back on Mary Magdalene because of her past? No. He brought her to the light. Think about that before you get so judgmental.
And have unique CLLI codes...
Exceedingly excellent!
Another interesting tweet.
April 5
Ryan Fornier tweet:
“Hillary *implied* that if she’s prosecuted, she’ll take half of DC with her.”
(No quote, no background, no context.)
So has Hillary been implying again? 😱
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.