Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
“Disney has already put the infrastructure in place, but Disney (or their allies) own it. So for Florida to take that stuff over they'll either have to pay Disney for the stuff, or build it themselves.”

That is not what is at stake.

Anything that Disney is providing via Reedy Creek Improvement District can be provided by Orange or Osceola counties - just at a higher cost to Disney when the counties raise taxes high enough to cover tag, tax, shipping, dealer prep, and options.

And installing a new widget in their park might take an additional 24 months when land use decisions are made by the counties instead of the company-owned Reedy Creek Improvement District. Maybe they are denied the widget outright under new, county oversight.

Disney was given Reedy Creek semi-autonomy in the 1960s because they said they would not come to Florida without it. They don't want to lose it.

This is a pressure point for the governor and the legislature.

70 posted on 03/31/2022 2:44:03 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: jeffersondem

And they won’t lose it. Between their lawyers, and using PR to sway the public to pressure the legislators to stop this fight. It’s a pressure point all right, AGAINST the governor and legislature.


72 posted on 03/31/2022 2:49:03 PM PDT by discostu (like a dog being shown a card trick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson