Posted on 03/31/2022 9:14:25 AM PDT by ransomnote
All the focus is on YOU wearing a mask. But this is a distraction. The big violation of federal law is by the FAA and the airlines in allowing vaccinated pilots to operate the plane.
I hate all the nagging whenever I fly that I have to wear a mask. This is nonsensical because the randomized trials all show that masks make no difference (unless you are wearing a P100 respirator or better).
This seems to be a distraction though, because the serious violation is being done by the FAA and airlines themselves in allowing pilots who have been vaccinated with the experimental vaccine to fly. That’s prohibited under federal law.
This was very clearly brought to the attention of the FAA and airlines three and a half months ago on December 15, 2021:
Their response: crickets.
At a minimum, I suggest that the next time you board a plane, point out to the flight attendants that the plane is being operated in violation of federal law.
Time for a TRO?
I guess it is time to file for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction in Federal court to prohibit these vaccinated pilots from flying. I am happy to fund this. It’s the right thing to do.
What do you think?
Please share this article.
A strike wrote: “The (not a) vaccine “approved” by the FDA is not available in the United States. All the others, which are in use here, are non-approved.”
Please explain how something can be identical to and interchangeable with something and not be the same thing.
“Please explain how something can be identical to and interchangeable with something and not be the same thing.”
Please explain why you don’t understand that the FDA approved one specific “vaccine” not your definition of the same thing.
The others are not approved.
The Federal Air Surgeon determined that FAA medical certificate holders may not act as pilot in command, or in any other capacity as a required flightcrew member, for 48 hours after each dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson vaccines. The Federal Air Surgeon made this determination after evaluation of available medical information about these COVID-19 vaccines and potential side effects. As a result of this determination and consistent with 14 CFR § 61.53(a), each person subject to part 67 who receives the vaccine must wait 48 hours after each dose before acting as pilot in command or as a required flightcrew member.
In the event that an FAA medical certificate holder experiences side effects after the 48-hour period has elapsed, the medical certificate holder may not act as pilot in command, or in any other capacity as a required flightcrew member as described at 14 CFR § 61.53(a) for the duration of the symptoms.
As additional data becomes available and the medical understanding of the side effect profile matures, the FAA will reevaluate the “No Fly/No Safety-Related Duty” timeframe, as appropriate.
“Please explain how something can be identical to and interchangeable with something and not be the same thing.”
The same way Pfizer has legal protection against lawsuits for currently in use vaccine caused injury or death but not the FDA approved one.
“They’re the same” see how far that gets you in court.
What about Moderna and JJ ? Are they the same too and thereby approved?
We should fire everyone who doesn’t get the notAvax. Doesn’t work and has side effects. Your still delusional.
A strike wrote: “The same way Pfizer has legal protection against lawsuits for currently in use vaccine caused injury or death but not the FDA approved one.”
Even Malone admits that claim is incorrect.
Umm, Wrong, still.
The article’s reference to the Health Resources and Services Administration does not show or prove that there is an exemption to liability protection for Comirnaty other than an assertion that “Like HRSA, The PFIZER REPRESENTATIVE Told Us that the liability protections pursuant to the public health emergency extend to both the vaccine under emergency use authorization and to the fully licensed Comirnaty.”
Likewise the existence of the totally useless Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program, which has done exactly jackshiite for the tiny handful of those seeking compensation, does not show or prove the exemption of liability protections for Comirnaty.
That you reference a “fact checker” article to obtain your information, bolster your position, and form and state your opinions certainly explains why they are almost always wrong.
You conveniently neglect to mention the Moderna and J&J clotshots. Do you maintain that they are FDA approved as well ?
A strike wrote: “That you reference a “fact checker” article to obtain your information, bolster your position, and form and state your opinions certainly explains why they are almost always wrong.”
And the reliance of the anti-vaxxers upon Malone, Kennedy, AFLD, etc., fully explains why they are always wrong. BTW, Moderna was fully approved in January. JnJ is still approved under a EUA.
“And the reliance of the anti-vaxxers upon Malone, Kennedy AFLD, etc, fully explains why they are always wrong.”
As you well know, anyone who does not go along with the MSM/Health establishment/sociall media /govt narrative is subject to suppression and censorship, Those few brave souls that do so are immediately punished.
Do you mean like the proven efficacy of Ivermectin in UttarPradesh and the countries in Africa that use it ?
and the extra high numbers of unusual deaths of young athletes ( DD-happens all the time) and the insurance companies actuaries finding that mortality among 18-64 yr olds is up 60% since since the introduction of the (not) vaccines?
Steppenwolf -” G-D the pusher man”
beware, the shoe currently fits.
A strike wrote: “As you well know, anyone who does not go along with the MSM/Health establishment/sociall media /govt narrative is subject to suppression and censorship, Those few brave souls that do so are immediately punished.”
The ones being punished are the purveyors of false information touting the success of ivermectin, etc. Please show results of large scale, gold standard, studies showing otherwise.
A strike wrote: “Do you mean like the proven efficacy of Ivermectin in UttarPradesh and the countries in Africa that use it ?”
Uttar Pradesh has been debunked numerous times.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/nov/12/facebook-posts/no-scientific-basis-claims-ivermectins-success-utt/
There are no large scale, gold standard, studies of ivermectin in Africa.
A strike wrote: “and the extra high numbers of unusual deaths of young athletes ( DD-happens all the time) and the insurance companies actuaries finding that mortality among 18-64 yr olds is up 60% since since the introduction of the (not) vaccines?”
Fact Check-No evidence COVID-19 vaccines are linked to athletes collapsing or dying from myocarditis
Yep, no shame.
G-D the pusher man.
A strike wrote: “Yep, no shame. G-D the pusher man.”
The ‘pusher men’ are those who are pushing snake oil remedies like ivermectin and HCQ, both of which have been proven to be ineffective against COVID.
Yeah definitely a shameless stone cold pusher desperately clinging to falsehoods, even more stubbornly than MSNBC claiming no stolen election (which he probably also believes).
politifact, factchecks, facebook-posts, reuters article sport/fact-check ...
Really, Seriously dude ?
You should be extremely embarrassed but of course you’re not.
A strike wrote: “politifact, factchecks, facebook-posts, reuters article sport/fact-check ... Really, Seriously dude ?
You should be extremely embarrassed but of course you’re not.”
Anyone who believes that the vaccine is worse than the virus:
Anyone who believes the vaccines are not safe and effective:
Anyone who believes COVID and the vaccines are part of world wide conspiracy:
Those are the ones who should be embarrassed.
I’m sure you just overlooked adding :
“Anyone who believes the 2020 election was stolen.”
Wow!
Can’t make this Shiite up!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.