I thought Campbell’s Soup would be suing him.
Thank gawd they aren’t wasting time and effort on trivial things,,
,, like,,,,say,,
Election/voter fraud.
Spit.
She was never jealous of his success, she just said, that all the kids called him 'sissy"
Personally, I think his "art" is crap, although Campbells soup got a ton of free publicity.
Derivative works are subject to the original copyright. (Just ask Vanilla Ice.)
This will be interesting.
This may be the end of memes.
This is what we’re worried about?
Of all the very important cases they take a pass on and ignore but this is somehow more pressing?
We’re circling the bowl guy’s.
If Goldsmith took the picture while working on assignment for a Newsweek, then the rights to the picture would belong to Newsweek. If Warhol used the photo published by Newsweek, then Newsweek would be the copyright holder and the aggrieved party.
If it was never published then how did Warhol get the picture? Did he buy it? If so Warhol would own the rights.
I don’t see how Goldsmith has standing.
Additionally if he didn’t notice the infringement for 40 years, then there’s insufficient evidence of a copyright infringement. And if he did notice it 40 years ago, then he waived the copyright by waiting too long to complain.
But SCOTUS doesn’t have time for thousands of election fraud whistle blower witnesses? At least elite owner copyright law will be interpreted.
The same Supreme Court that refused to hear an appeal of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision regarding election law violations? Nice.