Posted on 03/28/2022 7:07:25 AM PDT by upchuck
I recently met with a functional medicine doctor. Among other things, functional medicine doctors have been known to use darkfield microscopes and live blood analysis which is shunned by the mainstream medical community as quackery.
OK, now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, let’s get to what the slides show.
First off, using a microscope to look at blood is not an unreasonable thing to do. Using a darkfield microscope just provides additional contrast.
In my case, the doctor took a blood sample from me, put it on a glass slide, and covered it with a glass cover. We weren’t in his office so the sample dried out before he looked at it, but he said what he saw was consistent with what he’s observed in every COVID vaccinated patient he’s looked at.
(Excerpt) Read more at stevekirsch.substack.com ...
Ping.
“using a microscope to look at blood is not an unreasonable thing to do. “
yep
folks been doing that for a very long time.
If is sounds like a quack....
p
Slowly but surely the truth will be revealed.
The truth is this vaccine was/is not safe. While the injections may only negatively affect a small subset of the population, the data (from CDC VAERS) says that the number of deaths from COVID vaccines outnumbered the total of all combined reports from vaccines for the last twenty years! That happened in just one year — the COVID VAX year.
There is more to come.
Those pics are not from a dark field illumination set up
The pictures of the blood looks green. Is it Vulcan?
“While the injections may only negatively affect a small subset of the population”
I suspect it’s not as small of a subset as you may think.
Every day I hear or read something that confirms my decision to refuse these little tested experimental treatments was the absolute correct one and today is no different.
Speaking of “quackery”.
IBT$$DBs ping.
($hot $hill Drive By’s...who smear the source..)
Nifster wrote:
“
Those pics are not from a dark field illumination set up
“
What type of setup -are- they from?
Thank you.
From what I just read, the darkfield scopes are not usually used with contrast or stained samples. This means that often the details of the cells can be lost in the image.
I wonder if those things would be more identifiable using another type of scope with some contrast agent?
Its been a long while since I spent time gazing into a microscope.
Those things look like single celled “entities.” Usually a normal optical scope would not be powerful enough to see a virus...at least that was my understanding.
The problem is that the nanotech is powered by a D cell battery
“The truth is this vaccine was/is not safe. “
That’s the same thing Democrats said when Trump was in office.
That has more to do with the type of light used. I imagine they would change light colors to try to gain contrast. We used to do that in black and white photography. Different filters make the objects more “spectacular.” I am sure its the same with “little” images as well.
Hells bells, I don’t know *what/who* to believe, anymore.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.