The yutes have it so good that they have to make up stuff to worry about.
What can be done? One, I think, is to listen to young people’s fears with respect and not to dismiss them.
You mean ‘vaccinated’ youths have abruptly begun to worry about climate change to the point it’s harming their mental health? Because there are some who have written papers claimning the ‘vax’ will do that too.
When the Irish youths no longer have food on their tables and there’s no more electricity or gas, I’m certain they’ll die happy knowing how they saved the planet.
Who would have thought that nonstop doom and gloom with little to no basis in reality would cause gullible youth to suffer from mental issues?
What is to be expected when people are constantly bombarded by various messages of doom? Most news reporting is sensationalized, including the weather. Any weather outside of 73 degrees and sunny is claimed to be the result of climate change. What passes for education plays a big role too. Of course, people who have been ground down and are fearful are easier to control, which is one of the intended results of the propaganda.
Well, that’s what crazy does to a person.
Shocker! /s
Who’s surprised???
Quit raising weak, woke, wimps! Quit it people!
How about we lock up the arsonists(media and politicians)?
The yutes will soon learn what to really worry about, like keeping warm and food and getting to where they need to be instead of satisfying their heart’s desire.
Self-actualization and the climate will be a thing of the past.
The Fourth Turning has arrived, not all will survive and it will be very rough for all but the elites.
No surprise, they would have to be shielded from public schools, the MSM and TikTok to successfully avoid the constant drumbeat of impending doom.
I didn’t realize youths had any mental health. Must of added that after I got old.
Fears caused by lies about climate change are impacting young people’s mental health
there has to be a way to bury the FakeNewsMSM:
22 March: ClimateRealism: Media Scares Themselves, Confuse “Unprecedented” Weather Model Temperature Spikes with Actual Temperatures
By Anthony Watts (WattsUpWithThat)
This past week two left-leaning media outlets, MSN (via The Washington Post aka WaPo), and the always alarmed UK based The Guardian ran stories saying the Arctic and Antarctic, had experienced “unprecedented” high temperatures. These claims can’t be verified since they were the results from a set of weather model simulations, indicating variations of above normal temperatures for the regions, not actual surface temperatures measured by ground-based weather stations...
These researchers, and the corporate media outlets which uncritically parroted their claims, have presented no extraordinary evidence that either Antarctica or the Arctic experienced an unusual spike in warming. Model simulations simply aren’t evidence.
https://climaterealism.com/2022/03/media-scares-themselves-confuse-unprecedented-weather-model-temperature-spikes-with-actual-temperatures/
Michaels, P. J. (1999, July 13). Global Warming’s Dirty Secret. Cato.org. Retrieved March 24, 2022, from https://www.cato.org/commentary/global-warmings-dirty-secret
The lead story on the June 29 MSNBC News was that there were terrible floods in the United States and–interspersed in the middle of the story–that global warming is going to be even worse than we thought. This was one‐sided, emotional science reporting even worse than I thought possible.The story was rooted in a recent study by Tom Wigley, introduced as “a respected climatologist.” Wigley’s study was financed by the Pew Foundation, which is running a multi‐million‐dollar campaign to hype global warming.
...
Having held a doctorate in climatology for two decades, I feel confident in saying that every one of my colleagues who has expressed an opinion to me dislikes Wigley, mainly because he seems arrogantly dismissive of some facts when they get in the way of his theories. He actively discourages the airing of points of view that conflict with his.
In October 1994, at a global warming meeting called by Rep. John Dingell (D‑Mich.), Wigley was confronted with the reality that satellites had found no warming. He merely waved his hands and said, “Oh come now, that's just the satellite data.” Oh come now, Tom, it's just the only global measure of temperature that exists!
...
He co‐authored a famous 1996 paper that showed that, from 1963 through 1987, the behavior of the atmosphere did in fact increasingly resemble that of one in which greenhouse warming was being counteracted by sulfate cooling. But the data available for his study actually began in 1957 and ended in 1995. When all of the data on the critical region of the atmosphere was looked at, there was no change whatsoever! Wigley has never given a satisfactory explanation of why he ignored all the data. Should he write a response to this paper, I reserve the right to reply.
Muller, Richard. (2005, October 15). Global Warming Bombshell. Technologyreview.com. Retreived March 24, 2022, from https://www.technologyreview.com/2004/10/15/274740/global-warming-bombshell/
But now a shock: Canadian scientists Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick have uncovered a fundamental mathematical flaw in the computer program that was used to produce the hockey stick. In his original publications of the stick, Mann purported to use a standard method known as principal component analysis, or PCA, to find the dominant features in a set of more than 70 different climate records. AdvertisementLife, Liberty and LevinInterview with Professor Patrick Michaels posted Nov 3, 2018, from Oct 21, 2018.But it wasnt so. McIntyre and McKitrick obtained part of the program that Mann used, and they found serious problems. Not only does the program not do conventional PCA, but it handles data normalization in a way that can only be described as mistaken.
Now comes the real shocker. This improper normalization procedure tends to emphasize any data that do have the hockey stick shape, and to suppress all data that do not. To demonstrate this effect, McIntyre and McKitrick created some meaningless test data that had, on average, no trends. This method of generating random data is called Monte Carlo analysis, after the famous casino, and it is widely used in statistical analysis to test procedures. When McIntyre and McKitrick fed these random data into the Mann procedure, out popped a hockey stick shape!
CO2 does not explain climate change over the last 100 years, and the computers models are predicting far too much warming. The models have been wrong for over 20 years. The only model that has worked for the last 20 years is the Russian model which does not show much warming. Most of the talk about climate change is about models that have been wrong for over 20 years.
Before that, there was the University of East Anglia "Climategate" over released emails showing rigging of data and models. The issues over Michael Mann's "hockey stick" graph which as I recall, showed global warming even if random data was put into it. The evidence that past temperature records are being rewritten to prove warming in models, which is tampering with government records.
Of course, in today's grade schools good luck having this taught or talked about openly at all.
Democrats are having an even greater impact with all the fear porn they are swamping young people with.
Then to be followed by something called Nuclear Winter.
So, yes, yutes should get out their beachwear, but keep a good parka in the closet for later.
They’ve been trying to scare people for a really long time. I’ve been watching some old eighties shows the last couple of weeks and they were inserting agendas back then, too.
Wouldn’t it be great if all had a boomers’
birthday? The first gen after WWII were
brought up right. What the hell happened?
Hippies?