If you love what happened in Afghanistan, you’re going to love Ukraine.
https://charliekirk.com/podcasts/?ep=2500491b-5877-402d-9bea-ae5501400c5f
Charlie Kirk is a globalist shill for outsourcing billionaires. He saw the way the wind was blowing and stopped trashing Trump. But he’s no different than the fraud JD Vance.
“...Charlie makes arguably the most convincing case you’ll hear...”
-
So, what was it?
Many believe that dog and pony show Rubio did revealing the bio weapons labs snd their fear Russia will use them was setting the stage for us using them on Ukranians and blaming Russia.
Thanks and good for Kirk.
Eisenhower did not intervene in the Soviet put down of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution. He recognized that the risk was not worth it.
The U.S. vice-president R.M. Nixon said that: “We couldn’t, on one hand, complain about the Soviets intervening in Hungary, and, on the other hand, approve of the British and the French picking that particular time to intervene against [Gamel Abdel] Nasser.” Despite earlier demands for the rollback of Communism and of the Leftist liberation of eastern Europe, Dulles told the USSR that: “We do not see these states [Hungary and Poland] as potential military allies.”
In 1998, the Hungarian ambassador Géza Jeszenszky criticised Western inaction in 1956 as disingenuous, recalling that the political influence of the United Nations readily applied to resolving the Korean War (1950–1953). Moreover, the study Hungary, 1956: Reviving the Debate over U.S. (In)action During the Revolution confirms that the Eisenhower government did not intervene to the Hungarian Revolution – which occurred in the Soviet sphere of influence – because the USSR would have responded with a nuclear war.
Rd later.
The most obvious reason for the US not getting involved.
Does anyone really think Biden won’t totally eff everything up?
“If you guys loved what happened in Afghanistan, you’re gonna be THRILLED with what’s going to happen in Ukraine.”
and,
“Do we fight to win? No.”
Sorta sums it up. Everything he stated: He’s not wrong, but ignoring how this situation was created in the first place doesn’t lend him credibility. Perhaps he went on longer, but the linked audio is only a half hour and he mostly rants on the administration, the ‘deep state’ (though he doesn’t frame it that way) and the debate on sending $$ & military aid.