Hillary Clinton Won't Run in 2024, Rules Out Possible Trump Rematch

Newsweek ^ | 3/8/2022 | Katherine Fung

[simpson96]

Hillary Clinton is making it clear she has no plans to run for the White House again, ruling out a possible rematch with former President Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election.

Asked whether she would be open to running for president again, Clinton laughed it off, telling MSNBC's Morning Joe on Tuesday, "No, no, but I am certainly going to be active in supporting women running for office and other candidates who I think should be re-elected or elected—both women and men."

There had been speculation that Clinton could potentially cast a presidential bid in 2024, after skipping the 2020 primary, and some were hopeful to see a return given President Joe Biden's age as the oldest president to be inaugurated and Vice President Kamala Harris' fairly low approval ratings.

Trump, on the other hand, has not ruled out a presidential comeback and has continued to hint that he may run again in the next election.

Clinton said that while she wouldn't be on the presidential ticket, she plans to continue remaining active in politics and policy as she has over the last six years.

[ByteMercenary]

Well since the CCF (Clinton Crime Family) foundation went belly up, cash may be a little tight.

[rrrod]

Dang...lol

[enumerated]

I’m not saying we should let our guard down at all - we shouldn’t.

But I really doubt they will get a second bite at the apple in 2024.

What happened in 2020 was high treason - engineered by a fairly small number of perpetrators - and then facilitated and covered up by a huge number of unwitting or after-the-fact accomplices who shared a desire to be rid of Trump and his MAGA movement.

But what these accomplices and apologists did unwittingly, or after-the-fact, was akin to helping your brother dispose of a dead body. You might be convinced to do it once when you can claim plausible deniability - but never again.

There will be cheating and illegal ballot harvesting, I’m sure.

But I doubt it will be anywhere near as brazen or extensive as 2020. Too many tens of millions of pissed off MAGA people will be watching, and too many tens of millions of others will be wary - they may hate Trump - but not enough to knowingly commit high treason.

For example, let’s say you were one of the 500 mules that got paid to drive around Atlanta and deposit large bags of ballots in drop boxes in the wee hours after the election. Did you know you were doing something illegal - possibly treasonous?

Or the poll workers who were caught on video entering reams of ballots into the system more than once? Or the adjudicators who mass adjudicated ballots with the push of a button? Or the poll workers who illegally sent Republican poll workers home or illegally prevented them from observing the count.

I’m sure that as these crimes have come to light, all of these people have been assured they will be given legal protection, and that they can successfully use the “just following orders” defense.

But what percentage of them will risk doing it a second time, under significantly more scrutiny? Some certainly, but I think 2020 level cheating was a one shot deal.

[bryan999]

b word

[devane617]

Stacy Abrams as his vp....watch and learn.

[antidemoncrat]

Once upon a time Hillary Clinton Won’t Run in 2024 and she lived happily ever after. The End

[dforest]

Lock that witch up. Why is she still free and the Jan 6th people who never murdered, bribed, raped, and lied in prison?

I can no longer have any pride in this wretched country when we allow vermin like this the luxury of not having to obey the laws like we do.

[Billthedrill]

Come on now, has she ever lied to us before?

[StAnDeliver]

Completely vanguarding Chelsea’s Senate appointment when Schumer retires before 2024 election. But Hochul is certain to appoint herself, which will force Chelsea to dethrone Gillibrand in an election year.

[bitt]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hbh2qXBMjuY

“because you’d be in jail”

BONUS! Trump at the Al Smith dinner too!

[joethedrummer]

“Clinton said that while she wouldn’t be on the presidential ticket, she plans to continue remaining active in politics and policy as she has over the last six years.“

And THIS is a HUGE problem with our “governance”… WAY too many “un-elected people are still “active in our politics”..

THESE are the very ones who installed Plugs Biden as the cardboard cutout “President” while THEY give him his agenda.

And folks like us no longer have a say; they aren’t accountable for anything.

[Lisbon1940]

I agree but it gets mentioned occasionally on FreeRepublic.

[delchiante]

She can pick up a rifle and go to Ukraine then

[haircutter]

She knows DJT will for once and all...totally destroy her.. and she earned it too.

and she knows we will BENGHAZI HER AND HER PAL, BARRY HUSSEIN....WE HAVE NOT FORGOTTEN...

[plain talk]

A woman’s got to know her limitations.

[Secret Agent Man]

She knows she’d die a three-time loser.

I am sure its already hard enough being a two-time loser.

[pollyshy]

Because she is the Harold Stassen of the 21st century.

[Vigilanteman]

I think 2020 level cheating was a one shot deal.

As an election judge (reelected to a third term last year despite not being on the ballot and making an effort to get the job for somebody else) in one of the larger precincts in our county, I see evidence to support both views.

The pro:

1. Our county now requires mail-in votes to be counted and reported first. If it isn't there by 8 pm, tough luck. The only exception has been a handful of overseas, mainly military votes, which are counted by the county canvassing board.
   
2. Mail-in voting is transparent, not secret with representatives of all interested parties present to review eligibility prior to counting.
   
3. We have a new system which creates a paper ballot scanned in as a voter exits the polling location. This creates a back-up verification to the machine total.
   
4. We have more angry people volunteering to serve on election board, especially at the courthouse where mail-in votes are counted.

The con:

1. I have long-time members of my precinct board so discouraged from what happened in 2020 that they won't re-up.

[enumerated]

Thanks for your service.

Hopefully, the understandable discouragement of some will be overcome by the anger of others who will demand payback.

I have both sets of feelings within my own self: partly, I’m so discouraged I want to just give up and go Galt; and partly, I want to obliterate them for what they did in 2020.