Posted on 03/06/2022 10:58:54 AM PST by ransomnote
[H/T rodguy911]
The only way to avoid World War III is to listen to both sides. The refusal to listen ensures that we will move into World War III, and this is not my opinion; unfortunately, our computer has never been wrong, for it is unbiased. It called BREXIT when nobody else did, and also forecast that Trump would win in 2016 when everyone thought that was impossible.
This time if our computer could hide under the covers in bed going into 2023, it would. We have the most incompetent crop of world leaders perhaps in human history, and the press is so anti-Putin that they are fueling hatred of all Russians which is vital to justify war. Not a single person will listen to both sides, and the people are being played as fools just as they were with COVID.
Putin’s speech has a lot of truth, for no dispute is ever just one-sided. The West has constantly moved eastward to the very borders of Russia. When Russia attempted to do the same to the USA by putting missiles in Cuba, we reached the brink of war, and only then did the world hold its breath and finally blinked. That crisis was avoided only because of a Russian who disagreed with his country’s propaganda, and risked his life and that of his family to save the world, for which he was punished. (see the Courier).
However, it certainly appears that world leaders are deliberately pushing us into World War III. In Slovakia, it’s now a crime to express any “acceptance of support” of the Russian actions or of their leaders, and special police commandos are hunting down people who do so in public offline or online. The punishment is 10-25 years in prison or up to a maximum of life. The Czech Republic is adopting the same law, but the punishment will be 1 to 3 years in prison. This is obviously inviting war, for this is ending any discussion or negotiation.
Putin is in power BECAUSE of the antics of the New York Bankers with the support of the Clintons. Are we in a grudge match against one man that the West has blamed for even putting Trump in office and now that justifies World War III? This is the backdrop that everyone should know before they send their boys off to die.
Let’s follow the money. Ever since the United States under the Clintons authorized the NY bankers to try to take over Russia with their own puppet, Boris Berezovsky, there has been a direct unspoken World War III that began in the financial markets. I was personally asked to invest $10 billion into Safra & Browder’s joint venture Hermitage Capital Management in 1999. I declined for our model warned that Russia was unstable. I was told they had that covered.
ransomnote: video available on linked webpage
I believe Hermitage Capital Management, which they wanted me to invest $10 billion, was not against corruption. It was fostering corruption. I also met with the producer of the Magnitsky Act film in Germany, Andrei Nekrasov, who began the film as an anti-Putin proponent came to see that he was being used. Andrei saw that the culprit was not Putin, but the bankers. When his film turned on the bankers and exposed all the people who mysteriously died who could have testified against them besides Magnitsky, I believe Browder or his lawyers went to the EU government to ban the film. Even the film on me, the Forecaster, was supposed to be on NETFLIX, and suddenly it too was banned. We all know what is now happening in this canceled culture. Tell the truth, and you are canceled.
The bankers were constantly trying to get me to join their schemes. When the banks would lose, they blamed me, claiming I had too much influence since they greased the palms of politicians and agencies, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF). A few months before, Safra held a big dinner for the IMF in Washington, DC. I was invited to show me that they had the IMF in their back pocket. You see, the way they operated was always to bribe your way to the guaranteed trade.
money-plane-crec-1996-02-13-pt1-pge196-2
Republic National Bank was also in cahoots with the US Treasury and was shipping skids of $100 bills to Russia. The link between the Clinton Administration and Republic National Bank was firmly in place. This is why all the bankers donated to Hillary yet banned their own people from donating to Donald Trump. The Clintons were 100% behind the bankers.
The Clintons made student loans non-dischargeable in bankruptcy for the bankers. Then the bankers got the parents to co-sign, and suddenly they had their houses all exempt from bankruptcy. They could just wipe people out financially, including the entire families, and throw them out on the street. This is all for an education that never taught even common sense, and rarely does anyone ever do what they ended up with a degree in except doctors, lawyers, and other specific training courses. There are no degrees in heading a country, running a bank, or even being a hedge fund manager.
MORE AT LINK: The Real Backdrop Nobody Will Discuss | Armstrong Economics
Jim has for a very long time required thread creators to post the exact title of the source article.
In your case you created the same thread two days ago or so. That’s Ok that ransomnote didn’t catch it as it’s good to have an important article posted on different days. Where is gets distracting is when people post important news of the same title and source on the same day or in the same hour.
Follow the Money Ping!
Did Wuli do that?
Bttt.
5.56mm
It was a general statement...
Frog spirits of Revelation.
Plain simple - it is Putin’s actions, not any response to them that risks WW III, if that’s what Putin wants now. Otherwise, it WILL come, due to no western military response to Putin now and it would be only a matter of time.
Plain simple - it is Putin’s actions, not any response to them that risks WW III, if that’s what Putin wants now. Otherwise, it WILL come, due to no western military response to Putin now and it would be only a matter of time.
If I understand that correctly, you're suggesting that any "western military response" to the Ukraine invasion carries less risk of initiating WW III, than no military response. If so, that's a very entertaining point of view...
;>)
Yes. Bullies back away most often when the counter measure is immediate and less often the longer they can inflict their measures on their victims.
When Russian agents got involved in attacks on Americans in Syria Trump responded immediately with a number of Russian military killed. It never happened again.
If Putin can get away with what he wants to do in Ukraine, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia will have targets on their backs, and Putin will try to take them, sooner or later. That will have to have a NATO response (because all three are NATO members/partner), but at that time Putin will make the attacks from the territories of Ukraine (by air) & Belarus (by land - which he is already building up in Belarus to do), putting the immediate theater of war not over Russia, and he hopes saving his forces over in Russia.
Putin can be countered now over Ukraine without any NATO response in or over Russian territory. Putin knows it which is why he is saber rattling about his nukes. He does not want to leave Ukraine alone but knows that that can work both ways - can stay out of Russian territory but don’t have to leave Ukraine alone. We don’t have to attack anything inside Russia. We only have to limit operations to where his attacks are taking place - inside Ukraine.
If we wait, instead of being a limited NATO-Putin skirmish over the territory of Ukraine, it will be WWIII. If we defend Ukraine now, Putin is done. If we don’t, Putin will try to keep going as Hitler did after no one stopped his initial conquests.
In reality, most war plans do not survive first contact with the enemy, simply because the enemy is never as predictable as the planners like to think. Therefore, while it's generally interesting to meet people who think they can predict the future, meeting such people becomes more of a concern when they advocate military action, particularly against forces armed with nuclear weapons operating on the borders of their own homeland. In those rare cases when a person is so confident of their prescient abilities that they would risk nuclear war, solely on the basis of their own predictions of the future, one hopes that individual is not occupying any relevant position of authority...
;>)
” particularly against forces armed with nuclear weapons operating on the borders of their own homeland”
The psychology of MAD has worked for decades now and it is going to continue to work. Putin’s generals will remove him rather than let him launch the nukes.
Are you sure? (Meant to ask in my previous post - where did you buy your crystal ball? I could use one, for buying stocks... ;>)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.