Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gundog

I agree.
I think the laws have changed but Im not sure.
My son was driving someone elses car and he was pulled over for speeding.
The cop looked past my son and saw a guy that he had arrested for possesion of pot somedays before that.

On the strenght of a supposion the cop pulled both of them in and made my son take a blood test.

They discovered pot in his system and he was charged.

My brother was the Sheriff and i said to him my sons rights were violated...NO he said.

Bull$hit...i believe they found the law unconstitutional


54 posted on 03/01/2022 2:42:14 PM PST by South Dakota (Patriotism is the new terrorism )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: South Dakota
I haven’t heard of any court rulings. My friends were finally through with their case in January. I found it particularly egregious, as used paraphernalia was the basis for hauling them in for urinalysis. This, after the State had voted on an initiative petition to legalize, and passed it. In a move that Kate Brown would be proud of, Kristi Noem blocked implementation of the law. Seems like under those circumstances they could have held fire on enforcement until it was again settled.

Looks like there’s a ballot initiative this November.

56 posted on 03/01/2022 4:14:39 PM PST by gundog ( It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson