Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers

grey_whiskers wrote: “Go befriend yourself, troll. This latest thread is brand new published research, not reused. ...AND the Pfizer-funding you rode in on.”

Not really, this has been discussed before.
Besides, did you bother to read the link at rumble:
“Professor Lawrence Young, virologist at Warwick University admitted the claim was interesting but claimed it was not significant enough to suggest lab manipulation. He told mail online: “We’re talking about a very, very, very small piece made up of 19 nucleotides.” It doesn’t mean very much to be frank, if you do these kinds of searches, you can always find matches.”

IOW, another attempt to make a mountain out of a molehill. If anything this link supports my contention.


41 posted on 03/01/2022 9:31:12 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke

You’re wrong.

19 consecutive nucleotides is enough to demonstrate that the coof virus was bioengineered.

Whether or not that particular sequence exhibits any particular bioactivity that has been seen so far.


43 posted on 03/01/2022 10:17:28 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson