Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Liar, liar, NEWS(?) supplier...

If it bleeds it leads, if it is BS pump it up hard; and always left, left, left...

1 posted on 02/27/2022 9:14:45 AM PST by DUMBGRUNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DUMBGRUNT

Full TXT:

https://archive.vn/XLNOy


2 posted on 02/27/2022 9:15:24 AM PST by DUMBGRUNT ("The enemy has overrun us. We are blowing up everything. Vive la France!"Dien Bien Phu last message)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Oh those pesky laws of physics. EVs will never make real enviormental or economic sense.


3 posted on 02/27/2022 9:16:56 AM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Batteries do not create power, just store it.


4 posted on 02/27/2022 9:18:24 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (Let's go Brandon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

The problem with batteries for EVs is very simple. They have to be relatively safe in a very, very, rough environment, as in down to -50F, up to +130F, and survive crashes at least as well as gasoline cars. And that’s not even getting into performance requirements.

Not easy to do, so most washout, but only after sucking some IPO type money first.


5 posted on 02/27/2022 9:19:59 AM PST by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart, I just don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Many of these breakthroughs are just not cost effective because either the materials are too expensive or the process is.

The good thing is that these breakthroughs are on the books in the event we find a way to make the materials or processes economical.


6 posted on 02/27/2022 9:23:40 AM PST by Jonty30 (How can you claim to help me with my healthcare costs when you can't pay for your own?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

An EV will require X amount of power to travel Y miles. A battery has to deliver that amount of power. That same amount of power must be put in to the battery to be stored for use. The issue is the rate at which the battery can absorb the power to store. It takes time. Also is the amount of power available to store. No matter how you spin it those numbers don’t change. The goal is to quickly cram enough power into a battery without it exploding.


7 posted on 02/27/2022 9:24:22 AM PST by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

hello, these companies are founded and or run by computer executives, thus the upcoming new and improved batteries are really just vaporware


11 posted on 02/27/2022 9:30:03 AM PST by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show hosts to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Ping me when Elon Musk announces that Tesla is going to hybrid vehicles that do not require a government subsidy to be profitable. Until then, this is all scyfy, like the jetsons.

Come to think of it, didn’t the Jetson vehicle have visible exhaust?


15 posted on 02/27/2022 9:34:48 AM PST by Bernard (Jeffrey Toobin may turn out to be the most ethical character at CNN because he only abused himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

This one small trick will help you ignore media B.S.


17 posted on 02/27/2022 9:35:46 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

I have a second vehicle that doesn’t get driven a lot. But when I want to, I throw the switch and drive off. I don’t have to top it up, or worry about the charge. Gasoline has millions of years of energy, and it’s stored in a safe and efficient delivery system. We’ve cut auto air pollution to nothing compared to 40 years ago. What’s the problem?


19 posted on 02/27/2022 9:41:38 AM PST by Not_Who_U_Think
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT
7%, consistently, for 20 years, is a fourfold increase in capacity.

If it continues, that would mean, in 10 years, we will see Teslas with a real 500 to 600 mile range for a single charge.

It is a big deal.

21 posted on 02/27/2022 9:45:48 AM PST by marktwain (Amazing people can read a persons entire personality and character from one photograph.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Personally I’ve always thought the way to charge a car would be to switch the battery to a charged one. The charge time is just too long. This would require universal batteries and a fast way to switch them. Just throwin it out there.


24 posted on 02/27/2022 9:51:17 AM PST by southernerwithanattitude (New and Improved Redneck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

This is so much like so many other topics, wash-rinse-repeat. How many ways do we state or argue just how toy-like EVs are and if they are not toys, just how limited or specific their use is?

Electric carts and golf carts have worked well for ages because of specific applications and locations. Each time I consider the EV I arrive at the same conclusion, that they are very expensive and glorified golf carts constantly and consistently limited in some instance or application. This has not changed and will not without a significantly different approach and it will probably not be a metallic / chemical battery except for certain and limited applications.


29 posted on 02/27/2022 9:56:38 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.I ha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

My thought is that it’s one thing to store a flammable material in your vehicle for as a power source (gas), but it’s quite another to store both the flammable material and the oxidizer together (bomb).


50 posted on 02/27/2022 12:05:22 PM PST by babygene (hMake America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DUMBGRUNT

The biggest lie they tell is they “Lie by Imply”.

Every article on EVs as well as Solar & Wind make it sound as if EVs, Solar & Wind are like what computers were in the 1980-1990’s, that is they imply these are some brand new technologies on the verge of incredible breakthroughs and quantum leaps, just only if those nasty Republican buggy whip manufactures would get on board and we just spend more money investing in them then the future is unlimited.

Wrong, the 1st Electric Car was invented in 1829, fifty years before the 1st gasoline powered car (Benz). The 1st Roof top Solar installation was in the 1860’s twenty or so years before the 1st Coal fired electricity generating plant, and Wind power is so old it is mentioned in the Bible.

These are not new technologies with an unlimited future, these are old outdated technologies already at or near their maximum potential and were passed over for fossil fuels for very good reasons.


56 posted on 02/27/2022 1:48:34 PM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson