Almost as stupid as starting the story in the middle.
There was a whole lot that led up to Arbery being in close proximity to someone pointing a shotgun at him. The jury in the criminal trial was privy to, and took into consideration the parts that you conveniently omit.
I am starting the story at the relevant point. Arbery chose to do the very dangerous thing. Had Arbery chose differently, nothing fatal would have happened to him.
When Arbery made the decision to attack a man with a shotgun, that was the decision that got him killed.
The jury in the criminal trial was privy to, and took into consideration the parts that you conveniently omit.
What I have observed about Juries is they are often idiots. Do you think Derick Chauvin "killed" George Floyd?
I do know the judge withheld information from the Jury, and I do know the judge gave completely incorrect instructions on the law, and so the jury had a pretty good reason for getting this verdict wrong.
I do know the entire national media *HATE* machine was after these guys, and I know many juries are intimidated by the hatred generated by this media lying system.
Right after Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted, people were threatening to burn neighborhoods. Do you think this results in a fair trial?
Bullsh*t. The Jury was terrified, and the news liars had polluted the jury pool anyway.
Now if you think there is some important part that I have "omitted", put it on the table and we will discuss it.
I think i've covered the only important and significant aspects of this case, but you may feel differently.