aMorePerfectUnion wrote: “Nice of you to drop by to score some additional $15/hour wages.”
So what is wrong by insisting upon articles with such sweeping claims be subjected to expert peer review? You did note that the authors admitted this ‘analysis’ would not survive peer review when they stated: “It’s not published in a peer reviewed journal since it doesn’t support the narrative...”
—> So what is wrong by insisting upon articles with such sweeping claims be subjected to expert peer review
In an ideal world, yes.
In a world where the CDC doesn’t even release accurate and full data, doctors are prohibited from treating patients, and critical racism is taught at medical schools, don’t hold your breath.
I’m responding to your reflexive denial of all other data.
Nothing is stopping any of these so-called “peer reviewers” from reviewing the report and publishing their own conclusions.